yeahm, that's how I feel, but tell me again how you're funded by success, and that being given chumks of money you haven't earned is unfair, and that you didn't become a PLC for money to buy players. Then study your own history, paying attention to what Mr Gibson did to save you from extinction, and Edwards reasons for becoming a PLC. please log in to view this image
Agreed about doing it in a different game. Definitely playing mind games. Think bailly pretty good but even if he wasn't and he has wasted money on players, at least he knows where the problem is. Better than persisting (although that's partly his job) with players who are not up to the job even if he didn't rectify it originally. Imagine if klopp kept going with lovren matip and klavan
You mean back in the 30's? You see that as relevant and comparable to an oil shiek buying Man City and your non argument yesterday? You're ****ing desperate pal. You've been googling a lot, clearly. Edwards floated because he wanted to sell the club, as plain and as basic as that. Simple. Of course it was to raise cash, who said it wasn't. YOU said we were GIVEN foreign money. You'd think Wet Ham were a fan owned self financing social club the way you pap on, and then you remember it's owned and financed by porn purveyors.
no, but I don't cry about Chelsea or Man City being bought and having money pumped into them without them being successful, I leave that to hypocritical cry-baby ****ers like yourself. Oh, and none of the shareholders were foreign billionaires? You have a list of all their names home addresses and bank balances I assume? of course you don't, you're just spouting your usual red-tinted propaganda. At least Matth has a valid medical excuse
Never once complained about it, just refuted your bullshit that we were GIVEN foreign money. We weren't. Those 'foreigners' took money out of the club by way of dividend, as this is what investors do. You can't handle being spectacularly wrong in everything you say so plough on in your usual batshit ****** manner in the hope everyone forgets what you originally claimed. If you genuinely think a bloke in the 30's giving United a few grand to get back on their feet post 1st world war is the same as what's happening at Man City then you're even more stupid than I thought, which is ****ing stupid. You're wrong. On everything. Accept it and move the **** on.
To be fair, some of the Spurs fans on here have tried to pull the same **** with Henry Norris investing in Arsenal after most of their players were killed in world war I.
Yeah, that's exactly what it is. Not that he bought you a promotion on the backing of two clubs that got done for match fixing. Your own official site says that you're the only top-flight club that's not there on merit.
I suppose the help we got given by other clubs when our first team was wiped out in Munich is just the same as the club being purchased by a billionaire and given limitless funds. Essentially.
No, by proving my point that you lot still prattle on about it 100 years later and have compared it to the same investment that was made into City and Chelsea. Same point that @Chief was making about the investment into Utd after the first world war.
What does your cheating have to do with City and Chelsea having foreign investors? You also have that, but it's an entirely separate issue. You get compared to MK Dons, as you're both **** ****s from South London, not Chelsea or City.
Why do you always fall back on that when you get called out on your bullshit? It's embarrassing. You reply without hitting the reply and claim rattled. "When all else fails, and you have been exposed as a ****, post a net, or better yet claim your opponent is rattled"
