Transfer Rumours City Transfer Thread
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
If Long is half decent (I haven't seen him play so don't know), he'll be the number one at some point over the next 12 months
I will have to have a Google and see what comes up.
If it is based on profit alone it’s a ****e deal.
I do remember us taking a small fee from Wigan to waive the sell on for Carroll. Then he went to Man United and we **** out. The Sheffield Steelers pocketed that no doubt
These are the only bids we've got on the table.
You must log in or register to see images
It's not a **** deal, why would a buying club agree to a sell on even if they make a loss on the player. You're agreeing to a share of their profit, that's all.
Always attracted the older birds me.
would have stopped hutton running through. not scared to take a yellow for the sake of the team
As soon as Long gets a chance I don't see Marshall getting back in. From the one youtube vid I saw of Long he has better distribution, command of area and generally better reflexes. Plus he's still young with alot of room for improvement. Adkins will be relishing the chance to develop a young keeper like that. On the other hand he still has to keep Marshalls confidence up.
At the cost of an average of 3 goals a game. I hope he doesn’t try to keep Marshall’s confidence up for too long.
Maybe as with Phelan, he doesn't have much say as to who plays in goal. MS saw he was **** the second he landed and promoted Jak,.
I was under the impression that a sell on fee was just that. They sell the player and we get a cut, irrespective of if a profit was made.
As I explained in the earlier posts.
It depends on what is signed in the deal. If it's only on profit, and the player leaves for the same or less than what he left us for, we wouldn't get anything. If we sold a player for £10m and he went for £15m a year later, and we had a 10% profit clause, we'd get £500k, not £1.5m. As the details are often left out, we won't ever know exactly how much we get, but it's never as much as we think it is.
Marshall needs to go/be dropped. Some players just don't work at some club's and he's obviously one. A new start is needed for all asap
Who would take him? No doubt be on a decent wage. I think most fans would be happy to see him go.