Though if you included the first bit of the search in Wiktionary you would getYou must log in or register to see images
If you really believe Maradona was an average player, as well as being a card carrying twat, I can safely disregard all of your opinions on football.Maradona was an average player who had to cheat ( hand of god ) to achieve the desired winning results.
Add to that, the rotundness one can be considered an ignorant, arrogant, loudmouth with a head like a smacked A-hole and your picture of him is complete.
You must log in or register to see images
[QUOTE="sb_73, post: 11918268, member: 1020406]
........If you really believe Maradona was an average player, as well as being a card carrying twat, I can safely disregard all of your opinions on football.
Though if you included the first bit of the search in Wiktionary you would get
Dago may refer to:
- Dago, an ethnic slur referring to Italians and people of Italian origin or ethnicity and sometimes Spaniards and the Portuguese (derived from the common Spanish name Diego)
If you really believe Maradona was an average player, as well as being a card carrying twat, I can safely disregard all of your opinions on football.
There's something in this. I was absolutely astonished to see that some ratings had placed David Beckham higher than Johann Cruyff on the all time ratings list. For me Cruyff was the greatest. Not just because of his footballing skills but because he represented a whole football philosophy - which is still alive today. I was about 11 at the time of the 66 World Cup, and things which happen at that age make a special impression, so Eusebio would also be high on that list. My parents both said that Ferenc Puskas and Alfredo di Stefano were the best, but how can I comment on that ?when you are asked who the greatest player you ever saw was it's very much a generation thing. You can't really comment on players you never saw. But it does stagger me when Man. Utd. fans, who are old enough to have seen both, rate Cantona over Best.
There's something in this. I was absolutely astonished to see that some ratings had placed David Beckham higher than Johann Cruyff on the all time ratings list. For me Cruyff was the greatest. Not just because of his footballing skills but because he represented a whole football philosophy - which is still alive today. I was about 11 at the time of the 66 World Cup, and things which happen at that age make a special impression, so Eusebio would also be high on that list. My parents both said that Ferenc Puskas and Alfredo di Stefano were the best, but how can I comment on that ?
I agree about not comparing. The players of today are probably faster and fitter (and more theatrical) but there are very few great teams around these days, particularly at the international level.It's not really fair to compare directly the footballers of yesteryear to those of a more modern game. Football and society has changed dramatically, most importantly with speed and general fitness. What was important 50 years ago may not be anywhere near as important today.
Maradonna was a great footballer with an iffy temperament and was and is a horrible ****. Anyway we all know the greatest player of all time was Devon White.
I’m not that big.I can’t see past Our Stan, meself.