The ballot...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Happy Tiger said:
It’s important that people vote for the concessions so we can reestablish the principle of them.

Then let the Trust lobby for further changes.

It’s a marathon not a sprint.
Click to expand...
No! These proprosals are nothing more than a piss take.

If the vote goes their way the Allams will piss themselves laughing at how weak and gullible City fans are.

Allams out and no compromises!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Van Winkle bamber, Billy Blys Cap and FILEYseadog
Bastards ain't they. With everything that's gone off does anyone actually believe we will see a change of ownership in the foreseeable future?
 
Like a fair few other long standing fans, I don't get a vote on a decision that affects the club, and in a cowardly way, I'm glad, because I can't see an acceptable option, including abstaining. I'm guessing it's an on-line vote, so spoiled papers aren't an option either.

If I was pushed, I'd have to vote in favour of the proposed scheme, simply because the existing one is so ****e, but deciding which turd I'd prefer to eat or to starve, isn't really a choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s02699, look_back_in_amber, TwoWrights and 14 others
DMD said:
Like a fair few other long standing fans, I don't get a vote on a decision that affects the club, and in a cowardly way, I'm glad, because I can't see an acceptable option, including abstaining. I'm guessing it's an on-line vote, so spoiled papers aren't an option either.

If I was pushed, I'd have to vote in favour of the proposed scheme, simply because the existing one is so ****e, but deciding which turd I'd prefer to eat or to starve, isn't really a choice.
Click to expand...
Exactly this <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
DMD said:
Like a fair few other long standing fans, I don't get a vote on a decision that affects the club, and in a cowardly way, I'm glad, because I can't see an acceptable option, including abstaining. I'm guessing it's an on-line vote, so spoiled papers aren't an option either.

If I was pushed, I'd have to vote in favour of the proposed scheme, simply because the existing one is so ****e, but deciding which turd I'd prefer to eat or to starve, isn't really a choice.
Click to expand...

Well put Dutch - the whole exercise is just another Allam **** sandwich, but on different bread.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summerof69, DMD and Kempton
Well I've studied the proposals and it looks like they've used the opportunity to broadly increase prices.

This at a time when thousands of fans have stopped going and the Club is on the brink of a double relegation.

Best run Club my arse.

You can shove it, I will not endorse this poll with a vote, I'm boycotting...again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ron Burguvdy and Kempton
Summerof69 said:
I agree with all of that except for the fact that I’m concerned that a vote either way gives the Allams what they want. It’s a no win situation.
If the majority vote against concessions (because they don’t agree with the way they’ve set it up, as it’s still unfair and divisive, which is precisely why they’ve done it) they’ll claim it as a vindication of their original pricing and if the majority vote for them, they’ll take that as a clear indication that most people are happy with the new pricing and won’t be prepared to change it.
Click to expand...

I couldn't agree more, it's a lose lose situation, also, if you don't vote then the Allam's, like they did with the name change rigged ballot, those are the silent majority and must be happy with the way things are at the moment. They will twist it any way they want, I have come to the conclusion now, whatever rigged price structure they concoct, they ain't getting any more of my money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton
Oh and that fan consultation over the possible new badge.

Does anyone else suspect Ehab saw the outcry over that pathetic new Leeds badge and thought, now that's a good idea.

Remember, 10,000 Leeds fans were allegedly consulted on this.

Right up Allams street is that.
 
DMD said:
Like a fair few other long standing fans, I don't get a vote on a decision that affects the club, and in a cowardly way, I'm glad, because I can't see an acceptable option, including abstaining. I'm guessing it's an on-line vote, so spoiled papers aren't an option either.

If I was pushed, I'd have to vote in favour of the proposed scheme, simply because the existing one is so ****e, but deciding which turd I'd prefer to eat or to starve, isn't really a choice.
Click to expand...
The problem is, enough will vote which will give it legitimacy.

I do understand both yours and Kemps points of view, and I agree, this is really ****ty, but that's hardly a surprise now.

The worst result will be for no change, and for that reason, and as ****e as the alternative is, we simply have to make them change it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Van Winkle bamber, ImperialTiger and DMD
I think I've asked this before, but if they made it clear what each stand was liable to be like ie family orientated, boisterous, more sedate etc, couldn't they just make everywhere the same price (with concessions, of course) rather than all of these zones?

Wouldn't it sort itself if people favour being with like minded people over a view in the Circle?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT and Kempton
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back