I'm trying to work out if it shows we're mature or if we're philistines as despite the thread title, there's been no mention of people running on tip toe, or tutu's*.
*no Desmond content.
*no Desmond content.
We’re mature philistines!I'm trying to work out if it shows we're mature or if we're philistines as despite the thread title, there's been no mention of people running on tip toe, or tutu's*.
*no Desmond content.
16-22 is mostly in the adult category really, not the 14-17 categoryPrices compared to the last season of normal passes:
Adult - £501-£572 - £324-£432
Senior - £260-£358 - £216-£324
16-22 - £241-£325 - £216-£324 (now 14-17)
11-15 - £90-£156 - £108-£216 (now U14’s)
U10’s - £30-60 - £108-£216 (now U14’s)
That’s useful context, and it shows the general reductions for adults and increase for kids wellPrices compared to the last season of normal passes:
Adult - £501-£572 - £324-£432
Senior - £260-£358 - £216-£324
16-22 - £241-£325 - £216-£324 (now 14-17)
11-15 - £90-£156 - £108-£216 (now U14’s)
U10’s - £30-60 - £108-£216 (now U14’s)
16-22 is mostly in the adult category really, not the 14-17 category
I’m a little more torn, but that’s pretty much what I said aboveIt is and it would obviously be better if the age bands were as before and contained no ridiculous restrictions, but we are where we are.
In my opinion, the most important thing is getting the principle of concessions reintroduced, the levels that they’re set at becomes the new battle.
That’s useful context, and it shows the general reductions for adults and increase for kids well
However the real test for me is what the ballot is comparing against, which is where we are now
For me the proposed ‘concessions’ are a very poor suggestion. Obviously I don’t have the numbers, so no idea if it’s a majority, but there will be many groups including people you would consider to be concessions that will see their costs stay exactly the same as now...or even go up!
I’ll wait to consider before I vote, although probably vote to accept to simply break the principle of no concessions. However if they are accepted then I think the focus of the Trust should be to gradually change them to something more palatable for future seasons
I can’t help but feel though that the vote will be very split and the whole thing will increase tension between different fans
It’s all very ****
Agree it’s deliberately divisiveThey trying to make it divisive and complicated on purpose, why they can't just have a straight forward price for each category and have done with it. Why, because they want to divide the fan base, and hope that enough people who are better off under the existing scheme vote for it.
I shall vote for concessions being brought back out of principle, but have decided not to renew my membership next season. I am sick and tired of these people playing around with peoples lives, and will not renew until they have gone. I just hope it is within my life time.
Agree it’s deliberately divisive
****e position for you to be in but very understandable
So I just voted to change to a pricing structure that I don't agree with so it changes from a pricing structure I really don't agree with.
This doesn't sit right with me, I'm very angry about that.
Well I sincerely hope they’re gone before you’re gone!I said I would keep going even though they stayed as owners, but being away this winter, and seeing how they have performed and playing around with peoples live, I decided enough is enough. I'm a corporate member, so pay quite a lot of money each year into the club, but not anymore until they are gone. The moment they exit I will renew immediately, as long as I am not 6 foot under.
Well I sincerely hope they’re gone before you’re gone!
(Mind you I hope they’re gone before this cup of coffee’s gone!!!)
Philistines? Right part of the world DMD, but I’d say our owners are more Arabesque...I'm trying to work out if it shows we're mature or if we're philistines as despite the thread title, there's been no mention of people running on tip toe, or tutu's*.
*no Desmond content.