MITO there is an unhinged element to your posts, ideologically driven, not information driven
You are a laughable clown, seemed determined to challenge everything I say with weak arguments and when you are proven wrong you just keep talking to cover for it.
You know nothing about it "scientist" leanings and gob off without even doing cursory research. Again with your pathological altruism. You definitely display some pathology mate.
Though I am sure the alert I just got has another of your ******ed replies that was posted in reply so quickly there was sure to be 0 thought behind it.
1. Sweeping generalisation?
Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/10/only-six-percent-of-scien_n_229382.html
Why are so many social scientists left-liberal?
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/why-are-so-many-social-scientists-left-liberal-1.2082755
Eight in ten British university lecturers are 'Left-wing', survey finds
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/educati...-university-lecturers-left-wing-survey-finds/
2. The more intelligen the person the more likely to be socialist in outlook?
See above, no one said "socialist" you moron, lefty != socialist. You are also too dumb to tell the difference between highly intelligent and highly educated. They are not the same.
3. Confusing nationalistic vanity projects such as iss with actual collaboration on science.
What does this ******ed comment even mean? I said international cooperation happens without supra national entities.
"Europe is characterised by failed states from behind the iron curtain requiring huge development and social growth combined with older states such as France UK and Germany who look down their noses at the immigrants."
You dumb ****, what was it you said about "sweeping generalisations"? More pathological altriusm, no facts nothing.
Your post is factless, pointless horseshit, and you are too ****ing stupid and pathologically altruistic to even discuss something honestly.
You're a moron mate, claiming millions of people are racist based purely on what delusions are in your head.![]()
don't be rude.
I am tired of having to make the effort of detailing the horseshit in your posts and replying, because you have plainly placed both you and I on ideological opposites when it's only you carrying the ideological baggage.
[HASHTAG]#disappear[/HASHTAG]
just a thought.Again a ******ed comment, didn't even read my post, just wanted to disagree right off the bat, you cabbage
You know nothing about guns you ******I suggest you try actually looking stuff up instead of instantly gobbing off.
Blaming the rifle's look? someone planning a mass murder will not do it if they cant find the right look of rifle?
Another of these ******ed replies = ignore
Wow [HASHTAG]#fullsisu[/HASHTAG]


wow typical Astro
I've little patience for virtue signalling types who display pathological altruism, coupled with not even fully reading, or addressing the point of posts, in a fact-less ideological driven manner.
Typical remoaner pro(re)gressive liberal fare![]()
Someone disagreed with you and you had a complete [HASHTAG]#meltdown[/HASHTAG] that included being unnecessary offensive and saying you wouldn't listen to any more opinions you don't like
Is that you Donald? Take your medication

old sisu did have them occasionally 
pot , kettle & black for some reason spring to mind .MITO there is an unhinged element to your posts, ideologically driven, not information driven
No, someone didn't read my posts, and replied instantly with nonsense, repeatedly, and when shown to be wrong cited "feels"
Ah the old Meltdown projection.old sisu did have them occasionally
You're the CNN of not606![]()
You are a laughable clown, seemed determined to challenge everything I say with weak arguments and when you are proven wrong you just keep talking to cover for it.
You know nothing about it "scientist" leanings and gob off without even doing cursory research. Again with your pathological altruism. You definitely display some pathology mate.
Though I am sure the alert I just got has another of your ******ed replies that was posted in reply so quickly there was sure to be 0 thought behind it.
1. Sweeping generalisation?
Only Six Percent Of Scientists Are Republicans: Pew Poll
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/10/only-six-percent-of-scien_n_229382.html
Why are so many social scientists left-liberal?
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/science/why-are-so-many-social-scientists-left-liberal-1.2082755
Eight in ten British university lecturers are 'Left-wing', survey finds
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/educati...-university-lecturers-left-wing-survey-finds/
2. The more intelligen the person the more likely to be socialist in outlook?
See above, no one said "socialist" you moron, lefty != socialist. You are also too dumb to tell the difference between highly intelligent and highly educated. They are not the same.
3. Confusing nationalistic vanity projects such as iss with actual collaboration on science.
What does this ******ed comment even mean? I said international cooperation happens without supra national entities.
"Europe is characterised by failed states from behind the iron curtain requiring huge development and social growth combined with older states such as France UK and Germany who look down their noses at the immigrants."
You dumb ****, what was it you said about "sweeping generalisations"? More pathological altriusm, no facts nothing.
Your post is factless, pointless horseshit, and you are too ****ing stupid and pathologically altruistic to even discuss something honestly.
You're a moron mate, claiming millions of people are racist based purely on what delusions are in your head.![]()
She is clearly sickened 


Gary Cohn: Key Trump economic policy adviser resigns
You must log in or register to see imagesImagcopyright AFP
Image caption Gary Cohn was director of the National Economic Council under President Trump
US President Donald Trump's top economic adviser Gary Cohn is resigning, the White House has said.
It is the latest in a series of high-profile departures from President Trump's team.
There has been speculation that Mr Cohn, a supporter of free trade, was angered by Mr Trump's plans to impose tariffs on aluminium and steel imports.
In a statement released by the White House, Mr Cohn said it had been "an honour to serve my country".
The 57-year-old former president of the Goldman Sachs bank had helped Mr Trump push through his sweeping tax reforms late last year.
Why has Mr Cohn gone?
Gary Cohn and President Trump were never believed to be close.
Mr Cohn wasn't specific about the reasons, saying in a statement it had been "an honour to serve my country and enact pro-growth economic policies to benefit the American people, in particular the passage of historic tax reform".
Once that mission had been achieved, a number of differences may have prompted the departure, including the possible looming trade tariff war and his differences on that issue with trade adviser Peter Navarro and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.
Mr Cohn had reportedly set up a meeting between Mr Trump and business executives who opposed the tariffs move. But Mr Trump pulled out of that meeting and on Tuesday reportedly asked Mr Cohn in the Oval Office to back the tariffs publicly. Mr Cohn did not answer, sources told Bloomberg.
In August last year, Mr Cohn had also criticised Mr Trump over his reaction to a far-right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, saying the administration "can and must do better". He was reported to have drafted a resignation letter after the event.
What has the White House said?
An official said: "For several weeks Gary had been discussing with the president that it was nearing time for him to transition out."
The exact departure date had yet to be determined.
Skip Twitter post by @realDonaldTrump
End of Twitter post by @realDonaldTrump
In a statement, Mr Trump said: "Gary... did a superb job in driving our agenda, helping to deliver historic tax cuts and reforms and unleashing the American economy once again.
"He is a rare talent and I thank him for his dedicated service to the American people."
And the markets?
Analysts were pointing to the resignation of Mr Cohn, a free market advocate, as one reason behind a drop in shares across Asia on Wednesday. The Nikkei closed 0.77% down and the Hang Seng 1.03%.
Rick Meckler of LibertyView Capital Management told Reuters that Mr Cohn was "very credible" and the resignation announcement "certainly causes short-term downward pressure".
The dollar continued its retreat against the yen, down from 113 at the start of the year to 105.6 on Wednesday.
European stocks also opened lower, the FTSE 100 and pan-Europe STOXX 600 falling about 0.5% after opening.
You must log in or register to see images
Does this herald a new direction?
Analysis by Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington
Gary Cohn was a bit of a stranger in a strange land. He was a Democrat in a Republican White House; an economic globalist working for a president who campaigned on economic nationalism. Now, it seems, Donald Trump's protectionist bent has pushed the top administration economic adviser to the exit.
This was not an unexpected development. By many accounts, there had been a contentious White House fight over whether to impose sweeping sanctions on US steel and aluminium imports - a tug-of-war that was settled, precipitously, by the president himself last week.
There were the rumours that Mr Cohn was only sticking around to see last year's tax bill over the finish line, after his extreme discomfort following the president's warm words about some of the white nationalist marchers involved in violent clashes in Charlottesville last August.
Mr Cohn was reportedly viewed by many Trump loyalists in the White House as an unwelcome interloper. Some on the outside, particularly in the financial world, welcomed him as a moderating influence - along with son-in-law Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka.
Now the former is leaving and the latter two seem greatly weakened. All this could
https://www.not606.com/threads/trumpy-pumpy.333623/page-139