The Premier League Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Yes, MOTD mikes picked up the discussion between him and the assistant. The assistant said, “if Lovren touched the ball, he’s not offside”, to which Moss replied “I’ve no idea whether he’s offside or not, I’m going to award the penalty.”
 
Wish we could play Chelsea now. You know they'll be good again when we come to play them.
 
Lovren touched it backwards.

But this is why the current rule is so stupid.
Kane was offside at the time the ball was played forward TO HIM. He was moving to receive the pass so the offside, surely, should have counted, irrespective of Lovren’s touch, as it happened first.

I pointed out, on Saturday, an incident at WBA. Stephens, I think, was forced to make a clearing header, because a WBA player was behind him, in an offside position. The clearance wasn’t great and led to pressure and the foul from which McCarthy had to make that diving save, just before halftime.
We could have conceded an equaliser simply because of the wording of the current offside rule, or it’s interpretation, which seems to prevent the linesman from flagging until the offside player actively moves towards the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: It'sOnlyAGame