Thanks mate.And you are the biggest tit of us all![]()
Thanks mate.And you are the biggest tit of us all![]()
I am afraid I have to disagree. A team's strength is always in relation to others. I am not sure many people would agree with you that the current team was better than the 2014 one. Of course Suarez was an integral part of that team and we cannot remove the key player from that team as it doesn't then make any sense. Its like saying Barcelona is not as good without Messi or Real Madrid of 2015/6 isn't quite that strong without Ronaldo. It is basically how that key player make others tick and transform the whole into a great team.
Yeah, I would. And this team will only get stronger under KloppI'd back this Klopp team to beat that Rodgers' team, tbh, even with Suarez.
Lets be honest here Klopp is to blame here because we knew how he would play the game as he is very predictable with his style of football. Liverpool are a great team and in my view would be even better with a coach who has more game plans in his locker.....Liverpool would beat the swans 8 times out of 10 quite easily but Klopp should know that a team at the bottom with a new manager who has improved the results will fight tooth and nail for a draw let alone a win and if that takes parking the bus to do it then carlos will and it worked.....It was bad planning by Klopp from start to finish as he could see after 10 minutes the way we we set up to play......A bad day at the office and lessons must be taken onboard when you play a team at the bottom fighting for their lives....
Yeah, I would. And this team will only get stronger under Klopp
Until they all get sold to Barcelona or Real Madrid![]()
I'd back this Klopp team to beat that Rodgers' team, tbh, even with Suarez.
As ever it is a matter of opinion (that's why we love football
For me the SAS in Rodgers's team would make mince meat of our defence. But more importantly that team would swat away the lesser teams against whom we are currently struggling.
Possibly, but history proves we had an identical record with this team, as we did with Rodgers' team at this same point in the season, despite having to deal with 8 extra CL games under Klopp.

dead right
We must see that in 2013/14 our run went from game week 22 to game week 34 (11 games)
we are now past game week 24 and have the same points.
Lets put this in perspective. In 2013/14 we were top for christmas. We lost two games on the bounce v cheslea and city (both away) and dropped 6 points. we then drew ONE game v villa 2-2 and went on that run.
from top of the league in 2013/14 at christmas we dropped only 8 points til game week 35.
we are LEVEL after 24 games with that year.... level... thats how competitive this league is. Theres 3 side ahead of us and spurs breathing down our necks.
From here the future is unwritten but with 14 games to go we need 10 wins, just to be sure of 4th place. thats scary how competitive a league it is.
Sure the SAS team with two lethal strikers would rip our defense apart. they ripped a lot of defences apart but I'd back our own front 3 to do the same to that 2013/14 sides defence.
The issue we have is creating genuine chances for that front 3 now. We need space and teams attacking us to create.
Lets see what happens. 10 games is a big ask now. It should be 9, there are 9 winnable games plaus some in the fixutres but this is about faith in the team and are be bothered.
the ideal is spurs or cheslea implode and make this a lot easier. Maybe I've more faith in thier quality to not to do that than i have in our quality to get 10 wins out of 14.
47+10x3 = 77 points. I think 76 should be safe and maybe 75. until spurs drop more points i wouldn't bet on the threshold being lower this season.
Why say it in three words when you can use one hundred and seventy-five!
Why say it in three words when you can use one hundred and seventy-five!
which 3 words says that mate?
which 3 words shows off the data analysis

Some things never change"Dead right mate"
Even added a unneeded word still![]()
