The Big Meeting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Fez said:
Seems odd, as the Trust have certainly favoured in ground protest against the owners (as opposed to match disruption).
Click to expand...

As I understand it, that has not been reported entirely accurately, the Trust don't actually have an issue with protesting in the ground (as you say, they have arranged protests in the ground previously), but they've always avoided arranging protests during the game and continue to do so.
 
Driff_Tiger said:
-> A simple sign of good faith by the Allams would be to put Hull City v Bristol City on the scoreboard tomorrow. It would be there for all of us to see. It wouldn't require a change in the "brand guidelines". It just requires Ehab to ask someone to change "Tigers" to "Hull City" on the computer.

[HASHTAG]#boom[/HASHTAG]. It is that easy. We wait with baited breath.It of course wouldn't be enough, but it would be a start. Many other things would also only take 5 mins (an instruction, a phone call, from Ehab).

-> The club should produce a range of options and these should be considered. Same applies to the use of the name, supporters do not need to spend any time on a list

[HASHTAG]#boom[/HASHTAG]. Again, it's that simple. They (Allams) know everything they need to know already about how the majority of fans feel. They are fuc.king us about (yet again), and some are falling for it (yet again).

[HASHTAG]#actionsnotwords[/HASHTAG]. It would take literally 5 mins to start righting wrongs.
Click to expand...

I am coming to the conclusion that achieving concessions, brand alignment and putting these two obnoxious ****s back in their box has become secondary to the Trust having dialogue with those who they really no longer should desire dialogue with. It now looks like they (and others) are going to do consultancy work for the owners totally free of charge - you really couldn't make it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: askewshair and Charon
dennisboothstash said:
But that's the point
The brand guidelines will be a formal document which tells everyone when to use each
Easy to write to ensure those four options are used correctly
Click to expand...

But who produces it?
There are only three sections
1.External Corporate
2. Internal
3.External Football

Nine Names
Hull City Association Football Club 1&3
Hull City AFC 1&3
Hull City 1&3
Hull 1&2&3
City 2&3
The Tigers 1&2&3
Tigers 1&2
Hull City Tigers Limited 1&2
Hull City Tigers 1&2

Thats five minutes of my time and five minutes too much time spent on it.
 
The Omega Man said:
But who produces it?
There are only three sections
1.External Corporate
2. Internal
3.External Football

Nine Names
Hull City Association Football Club 1&3
Hull City AFC 1&3
Hull City 1&3
Hull 1&2&3
City 2&3
The Tigers 1&2&3
Tigers 1&2
Hull City Tigers Limited 1&2
Hull City Tigers 1&2

Thats five minutes of my time and five minutes too much time spent on it.
Click to expand...

Doesn't external football get divided into "Hull catchment area" and "Everywhere else" or has that part of Hull City Tigers branding now been dropped?
 
Fez said:
I am coming to the conclusion that achieving concessions, brand alignment and putting these two obnoxious ****s back in their box has become secondary to the Trust having dialogue with those who they really no longer should desire dialogue with. It now looks like they (and others) are going to do consultancy work for the owners totally free of charge - you really couldn't make it up.
Click to expand...

We get it, you don't think the Trust should talk to the owners, now ffs give it a rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: howdentiger
originallambrettaman said:
We get it, you don't think the Trust should talk to the owners, now ffs give it a rest.
Click to expand...

Why, you and others are chipping in. Is it the line of thinking? I haven't mentioned the free consultancy on any other post; does it touch a nerve? Was it not strange that these controversial 'actions' totally failed to be mentioned on any of the Trust's accounts of the meeting? Was it not odd that it took the quickly published minutes (didn't you predict a 3 week wait) of the owners to reveal these strange agreed actions?

Who's playing who here?
 
The Omega Man said:
But who produces it?
There are only three sections
1.External Corporate
2. Internal
3.External Football

Nine Names
Hull City Association Football Club 1&3
Hull City AFC 1&3
Hull City 1&3
Hull 1&2&3
City 2&3
The Tigers 1&2&3
Tigers 1&2
Hull City Tigers Limited 1&2
Hull City Tigers 1&2

Thats five minutes of my time and five minutes too much time spent on it.
Click to expand...
I don’t know who has produced it, I haven’t seen it
Can you post it somehow?
 
Fez said:
Why, you and others are chipping in. Is it the line of thinking? I haven't mentioned the free consultancy on any other post; does it touch a nerve? Was it not strange that these controversial 'actions' totally failed to be mentioned on any of the Trust's accounts of the meeting? Was it not odd that it took the quickly published minutes (didn't you predict a 3 week wait) of the owners to reveal these strange agreed actions?

Who's playing who here?
Click to expand...

You’re just repeating the same thing over and over, it’s just boring, nothing else.

In case you hadn’t noticed, I gave up my role at the Trust a long time ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nbetiger
Fez said:
I am coming to the conclusion that achieving concessions, brand alignment and putting these two obnoxious ****s back in their box has become secondary to the Trust having dialogue with those who they really no longer should desire dialogue with. It now looks like they (and others) are going to do consultancy work for the owners totally free of charge - you really couldn't make it up.
Click to expand...
Some will squirm at that post, but there's definite truth in it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amberman8
This forum is really dull.
Everybody getting along is really boring.
What we could do with is some bickering and bitterness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cortez91
I havent had time to read through this so could someone give me an idea what exactly transpired at this meeting.??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back