Improvement if we were their comfortably yes! ( Which it should have been the money spent) Being their by the skin of our teeth no!
So if we win it's got nothing to do with Brucey's tactics. Loose and it's all his fault???? Poor blokes ****ed with logic like that.
Cyprus is right like. I didn't hear him get any credit for Chelsea, to use an example mentioned. It was all about Asamoah, Welbeck, Onuoha, Hendo and Ricco. No mention of how he set it out.
If you're going to be pedantic with me please don't twist my words. Having lucky wins ( Chelsea apart) does not make him a tactical genius, it makes him lucky. I shall repeat my last sentence. "It is the losses that clearly show his lack of managerial skill."
Cut the **** mate. Improvement is improvement. You obviously have it in for Bruce. Fact is you make your own luck in this world. As for money spent. Bruce has had next to nothing in today's terms. yet he's turned a group of over paid Irish misfits into the best squad I've seen at Sunderland.
Fine I shall take my **** elsewhere. I'm wrong and you're right. Bloody disgrace that I am, having an opinion different to your own. Just seen your last post, now I'm talking tripe? You keep defending Bruce bonny lad, not going to bother me, or change my mind, the only thing that could do that is what he does on the pitch. And all the stats in the world wont do it either.
Tripe indeed to say our wins were "not down to any brilliance on Bruce's part" yet the losses "clearly show his lack of managerial skill". I wonder who's fault it was we finished top ten for the first time in over ten years. And only the third time in fifty years. Stone me. If we ever get a manager who knows what he's doing we will piss the bloody league.
. I'm still chuckling at this. We have moved on and improved, but obviously not fast enough for some.
I was enjoying reading the OP untill we got to this bit, then had a funny turn Not right to mention those two without warning
