nobody was defending it. the debate was about whether or not someone would necessarily know whether they were over the limit
Knowingly. If you've had a session from say 8pm till 2 am quite a few beers and a couple of shorts, at what time will you be under the limit and able to drive?
Anyone who drinks and drives is a ****. Zero excuses. The laws useless too, should be automatic 6 months inside minimum. If you drink and drive you do not deserve your freedom.
I still have a lot of friends in the Alderley edge area.... this was a regular occurrence. Not a one off sadly
Oh dear, now what was I saying earlier. No excuse at all for this, he could employ a chauffeur. Drink anyone and one for the road
This^ I've always thought if I suddenly had ridiculous amounts of money the first person I'd hire would be a chauffeur Mind you driving bores me anyway, but why would you drive yourself around and have to stay sober when you could have the flexibility to have a drink wherever and whenever and your driver would take you home? I'd also hire someone to open my mail for me...I can't be arsed with that either (if times get hard I suppose my chauffeur could bring it with him / her and sort it while waiting outside the pub for me) ...in fact if I was loaded I'd hire someone right now to go to the fridge for me. Sadly I'm not so I'm going to have to go for a beer myself...I'm still grounded
Sky are doing plenty of editorial on Rooney getting nicked, but have made no mention of one of their lead reporters, Kirsty Gallagher, being in court this morning after pleading guilty to driving while three times over the limit.
What about if you have a drink and are not under the limit? Technically you've got an exuse then as you haven't broken the law.
