Off Topic To be Gay or not to be Gay
- Thread starter swanseaandproud
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
@Stumpy how can I treat you as my equal when your not as intelligent as me!!........
Your right, geniuses aren't as intelligent as a fools Phil, but they do have a lot more of it
So says Dr Tuck Ngun of University of California. I think I'm correct that's where your getting your inspiration from Monte, am I wrong? If not then you must be aware that his research is based on a 'could be, maybe' hypothesis. There is no 'absolute' knowledge in his work, just a load of whatiffs. In the Scientific world people like him are actually referred to as a 'Dr. Whatiff'. That's anyone who opposes impiracle evidence with, whatiff this or whatiff that scenarios to justify their media presence.
Last edited:
Your right, geniuses aren't as intelligent as a fools Phil, but they do have a lot more of it
..............................................
My information came from the eminent Professor David Swan of Penclawdd University - the worlwide authority on homosexuality.
Wut?
Dawkins is like a rabid animal and prominent atheists disassociate themselves with him.
Hitchens and fry are morons
The thing with this argument is that statistics back up certain things.
What I mean is, and it surprises me more isn't made of this, in some of the biggest cases of *****phile rings involving very young children (as young as a few months old) the main perpetrators/ring leaders have been gay men.
For a start off the ratio of gay / straight *****s is about 1 in 11.
Secondly, the link he was trying to make was one of complete ignorance, suggesting that kids would be unsafe with gay men, purely because they were gay. He was directly linking homosexuality with *****philia. So the reason "more isn't made of it", is that it's ignorant ****e.
As I said the figures are startling when you delve into them about gay men involved in *****phile rings
We just had the Asians and young girls in Newcastle and the " analysis " that has resulted on every media outlet
Yet the link between say the Norfolk *****/ child porn ring and homosexuals is unheard of.
Even high profile campaigners like peter tatchel and his obsession with ****ing kids is never discussed.
Always wondered why
I've just given you them 1 in 11, hardly 'startling'
Sounds like you're trying to make a correlation that isn't there, all of which has **** all to do with the original post I replied to btw.
The 1 in 11 is not accurate. As studies show that although a small percentage of men have homosexual tendencies, a larger percentage of peadophiles have homosexual tendencies.
So in figures if 4% of men have homosexual tendencies 40% of peados have homosexual tendencies.
My "correlation" was more about why since the 80's its been "discouraged" to link the 2
Well, if "Hitchens and Fry are morons ", we will need to come up with a new word that best describes you.
Last edited:
"you must believe what we believe"
My words, that you have taken out of context.
Post the supposed facts that back this up please, otherwise I shall consign to the made up bullshit file.
Course aye
You want to come up with a word to describe for me because I don't agree with you
"you must believe what we believe"
Peter Hitchens said it best when he said Stephen fry was a stupid persons idea of an intelligent man
You can consign it to wherever you like. I forget the name but that was actually from a study.
Mcoole, goad, Rennie are all names of high profile peadphile ring leaders abusing babies and kids from different parts of the world who were homosexuals
This is just of the top of my head
If that's the case you can find it and post it, as I'm calling bullshit.
Don't really care tbh
Its Friday so no time to get into it today.
Maybe useful to look into busted ***** rings and see who perpetrators were/are in terms of sexuality.
Of course you can choose not to but that only means you don't give a **** really, in which case I couldn't give a **** either
Fact is big link between ***** rings and gay men
It's not a fact merely because you say it is, if you choose not to back up your assertion with some actual facts then it remains bollocks.
The actual number is 1 in 11.
Muslims aren't keen on homosexuals though eh....