Saturday stewards cup

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
It's a ****ing sand rat who hasn't won for four years on grass. Some ****ing patrons of racing ye are if ye think that's all fine.
 
Reebok said:
I'm happy to be in the I-backed-it camp :)

I also don't get why some are deriding both Chelsea and the congratulators. Sour grapes I expect.

The shower of criticism from Boris of Der Kaiser Chefs, smacks of someone who didn't follow the recipe <laugh>
Click to expand...
It's not sour grapes mate. Look at the bigger picture. I'm sure ye'll back thirty or so horses who'll be done by flithy ****ers like that Ivory ****. Ye're at nothing then.
 
Doalittle said:
From a lad who openly campaigns his racehorse. You should know.
Click to expand...

Doalittle, if I can get the inside track on anything I am happy to take it. Most yards are on the fiddle and they have to be to survive. Don't hate the player hate the game.
Have a read of the spotlight comments on Jonjo O'Neills runner in the second race at Windsor tonight. ATR, RP and Timeform all pretty much point out that this horse might drastically improve now it is in a handicap. Doesn't that highlight to you that the authorities should be doing something more about this sort of behaviour?
 
stick said:
Doalittle, if I can get the inside track on anything I am happy to take it. Most yards are on the fiddle and they have to be to survive. Don't hate the player hate the game.
Have a read of the spotlight comments on Jonjo O'Neills runner in the second race at Windsor tonight. ATR, RP and Timeform all pretty much point out that this horse might drastically improve now it is in a handicap. Doesn't that highlight to you that the authorities should be doing something more about this sort of behaviour?
Click to expand...
Ah but all crap that's been written here about Jim Best, Jim Crowley, etc. but somehow it's a different story once some lad is has his few pounds on the right side of it. Give me a break.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stick
There was no skullduggery, just a decent horse who had a chance from the mark on its best form, the horse had absolutely nothing to hide after 40 odd runs and was dropped 2 pounds from its last run, the soft ground probably helped as well.

Anyone who thinks they knew it was winning and allowed it to start at 47 on betfair has lost the ****ing plot.

There appears no plan to retire, Dettori wasnt booked months ago, it wasnt the masterplan all along. The OP concocted a fantasy and this time the horse won.
 
Der Kaiser said:
There was no skullduggery, just a decent horse who had a chance from the mark on its best form, the horse had absolutely nothing to hide after 40 odd runs and was dropped 2 pounds from its last run, the soft ground probably helped as well.

Anyone who thinks they knew it was winning and allowed it to start at 47 on betfair has lost the ****ing plot.

There appears no plan to retire, Dettori wasnt booked months ago, it wasnt the masterplan all along. The OP concocted a fantasy and this time the horse won.
Click to expand...

I shall see Dean on Wednesday in O&T and just for you I shall ask him when he booked Frankie. Let you know what he says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mick the jolly sailor
I really am completely baffled by the criticism on this thread. It's a racing forum full of (mostly) strangers who come on looking for and to post tips. Some bloke has put up a horse at 33/1 which wins. Then because his story may or may not be bullshit he gets slated. THEN because the horse hasn't won for a while and isn't a particularly 'classy' animal or because, shock horror, horse racing might be a little bit dishonest yet again it's slated. I didn't have a penny on as I previously stated, I used my own judgement and decided against it. For the life of me I can't understand why this thread wasnt just full of replies saying well done Chelsea and that's the end of it. I don't know if it's people who didn't back it and wish they had or people pissed off they lost out to this horse or just general bitterness but it's such a shame to see on, what, for the most part is a very very good forum
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonic, Ste D, OddDog and 1 other person
He was called a a fantasist before it won, the fact that it won is irrelevant as far as im concerned, nobody said it couldnt win. Somebody has to call bullshit.
 
Der Kaiser said:
He was called a a fantasist before it won, the fact that it won is irrelevant as far as im concerned, nobody said it couldnt win. Somebody has to call bullshit.
Click to expand...

My point is though why does the bullshit matter? or why does it bother you so much? Why can't you just say 'well done Chelsea, you found the winner'. The fact that it was a massive price and people won money on it is just a bonus.
 
youre right it doesnt matter, lets all just talk ****, who cares

I might bring Frankel out of retirement and go for the puppy derby, im khalid masood
 
Der Kaiser said:
youre right it doesnt matter, lets all just talk ****, who cares

I might bring Frankel out of retirement and go for the puppy derby, im khalid masood
Click to expand...

So your issue is that you think someone, who you don't know and who posts anonymously on an open Internet forum might be a little bit dishonest. Ok fair enough.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back