No way was I insensitive in my first post on here nor did distort any facts. Just did not see the need to single him out about above others as, like many that night. were also brave. No apology will be forthcoming either as I answered all points that were put to me.
From then on the debate was mainly Smug's need to justify this trip in his usual way of deconstructing sentences to answer each of my points. No way at all did I debase this man's bravery that night, but if Smug feels the need to give him a trip to Sunderland than he can do, which I said previously.
I don't need to justify anything I do to the likes of you ...... I was happy to start it, am happy to continue it and will be happy to finish it, end of story.
You did debase his bravery in your very first post .....
"I for one do not see the fuss about this bloke."
In your second post you said,
" I have little time for the likes of this guy."
When Joe challenged you, the backtracking response was,
"I do have admiration for his type."
So, we've established you're a hypocrite.
You claimed he'd been singled out for media attention.
I had to point out how totally wrong you were. You quoted the story of the 'unsung doorman' who, as I explained had also been on ITV Breakfast News, been interviewed by the BBC and had appeared in the Star, Evening Standard, etc.
You ignored the basic point that I was doing this because he's a supporter of a team who'll be playing my team.
You disregarded the fact this is a football forum thereby making the gesture totally appropriate.
You post, "How I go about rewarding people and contributing to society is my business and it will be kept to myself."
Then you don't keep it to yourself
You keep 'giving me permission' to carry on and have done that on numerous occasions ......
..... let me make this totally clear, I don't give a toss for your opinions or 'permission'.
What I do is absolutely none of your business so please stop making the same ludicrous point again and again and gain.