S
Spur of the Moment
Guest
Usual **** being peddled on MOTD2 - Shay Given this time weighing in telling us how to pay our players or they'll go to bigger clubs!! 


Last time we played Stoke, he put his back out from excessive bending over to pick the ball out of the net. Shay GivenUsual **** being peddled on MOTD2 - Shay Given this time weighing in telling us how to pay our players or they'll go to bigger clubs!!![]()

The sunday supplement programme on sky were discussing Lingard getting a huge pay rise and then in THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE said it'll be a problem for spurs as Dele will be demanding a bigger deal from Levy ... and could well be open to a move to united as a result![]()
The sunday supplement programme on sky were discussing Lingard getting a huge pay rise and then in THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE said it'll be a problem for spurs as Dele will be demanding a bigger deal from Levy ... and could well be open to a move to united as a result
Does that mean that because PSG pay Angel Di Maria £179k per week, all clubs should pay players who play in his position the exact same wages?The sunday supplement programme on sky were discussing Lingard getting a huge pay rise and then in THE VERY NEXT SENTENCE said it'll be a problem for spurs as Dele will be demanding a bigger deal from Levy ... and could well be open to a move to united as a result![]()
One day it might occur to the hacks how ****ing stupid that argument is, because essentially what they're saying the the entire Liverpool or Man Utd team should be forcing moves to China this summer as there's clubs that pay far more than they're getting at Anfield or Old Trafford.
In the past the obvious destination would be a club of a similar status to Everton where he'd get a change of scenery and (in theory...) the team would play to his strengths.Going by his more recent performances I think he his more likely to be playing for Everton next season. Who would want him? Though maybe Newcastle would be a more realistic proposition if Everton want to cash in and maybe buy a decent midfielder instead.
He may want to get out of Liverpool, following this cheap shot on a night out:Going by his more recent performances I think he his more likely to be playing for Everton next season. Who would want him? Though maybe Newcastle would be a more realistic proposition if Everton want to cash in and maybe buy a decent midfielder instead.
He's certainly pissed.....He may want to get out of Liverpool, following this cheap shot on a night out:
You must log in or register to see media
Seems that he's pissed off some local crooks.

Interesting quote from that interview, though:Chris Sutton says that Barkley has been tapped up. he doesn't know by who and he certainly has no proof, but that didn't stop Sutton claiming that he'd been tapped up on 5 Live.

It would be funny if, should Barkley move this summer, the club that signed him promptly sues Sutton for slander.Interesting quote from that interview, though:
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/everton-fans-hate-ross-barkley-12877267
Everyone's favourite player, Charlie Adam, immediately refuting Sutton's claim by pointing out that he's probably assessing his options.
Then discusses where he can go and suggests all of the top sides, but dismisses us because we've already got better players!
He does mention that we've been linked with him too though, reopening the possibility.
Your account is accurate - from an inside source - and the problem for United is that a) they let the cat out of the bag yesterday that the seats were needed for staff and b) the CEO has set off on a kamikaze damage limitation exercise by slandering the 'victim'!!It would be funny if, should Barkley move this summer, the club that signed him promptly sues Sutton for slander.
Anyway, since I've got an excuse to jump into this thread, here's some shoddy non-football journalism: I'm going to guess a fair number of you have heard the story about the guy that was bundled off of a United flight? No matter where you read the story, you always hear the flight was overbooked and the guy was too late getting on the plane so got bounced.
There's a problem with this version of events, though: it's bollocks.
The actual story, which their CEO is trying to steer attention away from with his statement calling the guy "disruptive and belligerent" and saying their staff acted within their guidelines is the flight wasn't overbooked, what they were actually doing is bouncing several passengers off of the flight so other United employees could use the flight as a free taxi - and the guy who was being "disruptive and belligerent" was, quite rightly, demanding to know why he was being told to get off the plane when he'd paid for his seat.
I've flown United in the past and the only way I'd ever make that mistake again is if somebody forcibly dragged me onto the flight, but the fact that so many news vendors are missing the actual story and swallowing the version of events United are giving them beggars belief.

As the season comes to a close, I have finally found an article by a major news source which is writing the Narrative in our favour ...
...says a lot that American news sources are doing a better job than ours, doesn't it?