In reference to Robertson, don't want to see him go but we have a ready made replacement in Tymon. I'd hope we give him a chance and replace Robertson with a back up to Tymon.
the club allegedly couldn't be arsed to tell him they'd triggered the extension other than a letter, he's probably thought **** youMarco just confirmed snodgrass refused to talk to him or the club about staying just wanted out ... what a prick
In reference to Robertson, don't want to see him go but we have a ready made replacement in Tymon. I'd hope we give him a chance and replace Robertson with a back up to Tymon.
the club allegedly couldn't be arsed to tell him they'd triggered the extension other than a letter, he's probably thought **** you
i just think telling him verbally even if it was just a 5 min chat in the canteen would have been betterWhy should we? I'm no Ehab apologist here but it's completely weighted in our favour and we can trigger it any time we want prior to the deadline. He was happy to sign that deal and we behaved within the parameters of it.
the club allegedly couldn't be arsed to tell him they'd triggered the extension other than a letter, he's probably thought **** you
The only thing worse, is a poster that literally BEGS to be banned so that he validate his victim mentality. Stay strong, moderators.Nothing worse than a poster who irritates loads of other posters, then plays the victim card when those other posters no longer like him.
Marco does like to keep us in suspense just said this. Marco Silva: "I think Leon Bailey is having a medical, but I don't want to talk about names. When a move is made official then I talk."
So is it us or Germany
Nothing worse than a poster who irritates loads of other posters, then plays the victim card when those other posters no longer like him.
Surely we don't sell Robbo..
IF we did, surely we use a fraction of that money to offer Tymon a proper deal.
I'm not sure why people still fixate on this. It was in his contract, it was an extension in the club's favour that he was happy to agree to when signing, so why do the club need to discuss it with him?
I'm not sure why people still fixate on this. It was in his contract, it was an extension in the club's favour that he was happy to agree to when signing, so why do the club need to discuss it with him?
Marco just confirmed snodgrass refused to talk to him or the club about staying just wanted out ... what a prick
It's not about the extension, it was the way we offered him a new deal that ****ed the job up.
Do you think that has anything to do with the way he was treated by the club with his contract?
Ive said it before , but it is unbelievable we are in the bottom 3 with a squad full of 30 million players like some of you lot think ..
It's not about the extension, it was the way we offered him a new deal that ****ed the job up.