The EU debate - Part III

What informed that independent thought Stan. Come on, spit it out.

 

I just don't believe in god. I suspect anyone else reading this would just think "fair enough" as opposed to "how can I spin this out to get through a few more minutes until @Watford_R and @PleaseNotPoll start posting again".

I also don't believe in unicorns.

 

What you're trying to say is, that it was no doubt at a superficial level, but you looked into things, and decided it wasn't for you. Some would call that education.

 

Yeah, I got called in

Tbf I get paid on a day rate so I am gaining and tbh its only light work.

Know anything about Dalair air handling units?!

 

What I'm saying (not trying to, just saying) is that Stan doesn't believe in god. It's that straightforward. I'm sorry if that doesn't help you deflect from your post about Muslims needing to be educated.

It's interesting that you focused on Muslims and not, for example, Christians or Buddhists. Kustard does that as well when he's preaching about how he doesn't believe in religion. It's always Muslims that are used as the example. Odd that.

Stan doesn't judge people based on which god they choose to believe in (or not).

 

Absolutely nothing. Try HIAG. I believe he studied them at the Sorbonne.

 

Except it does have a basis in fact. The Spurlock incident, for example. The rest you've made up based on nothing. As with your current discussion with Stan, if the conversation doesn't go the way you try and engineer it towards you just post that conclusion anyway and tell yourself you're right.

 

please log in to view this image

There we go folks

 

If you'd voted Remain, Dull would see this as an opportunity to generate a discussion and fill a few hours of an otherwise pointless life

 

Oh, fair enough.

Who is 'dull' btw?

 

I was asking questions about Islam, because I was interested in it. I'd done similar on other religions elsewhere. I have an interest in quite a few things, some I know little about.

I don't judge people on whether they believe or not, but despite your attempt to twist things and divert, you've finally owned up to not believing in a god having educated yourself. The very thing you were trying to claim made me a bad person.

I noticed you trying to garner support on other threads, squealing about being stalked, which is hilarious given I ignore the bulk of your tedious interruptions.

Fair play, your wriggling has nicely disrupted another discussion that was on going. Now you've made a tedious arse of yourself, and shown yourself to be a fool and a hypocrite, perhaps the discussion can carry on.

 

It has zero basis in fact.

 

The fact I've been called in today lads is because we have too much work to price that we don't actually have enough time to do it.

So you could say we're in a post-Brexit boom

Jobs I a dealing with have a duration of approx. 2 years which will hopefully tie me over for any economic dips

 

Just Silly Stan's pet name for one of a number of posters he hangs around in his quest for attention. Boring **** that he surely is.

He's a nasty side though, he takes joy in the tragic suffering of migrants.

 

I just don't believe in god Dull. I've said that on many occasions so not sure why you're saying I've finally owned up to it.

It's that straightforward. Sorry if that ****s with your preconceptions. Kustard, Tiddler and wetty all made the same mistake. Coincidence!

 

@NowsufferinginSpain

I totally agree with this and if you really believe it too, why do you continually post negative forecasts and try to pass them off as fact? Every prophecy of doom is posted as though you know our future with total certainty.

So which is it, uncertain or certain? You can't have it both ways.

 

Finally you got round to calling me a ****! Back to start

 

What was wrong with the example I gave?

 

So you decided based on no information whatsoever. You've never heard or read anything from the bible or other religious books, or looked at the science or history angle? Spin away wee man, you used education to come to your conclusion.

 

It doesn't support your claim.