Are Hull Trains putting on a special?
Ehab Allam 17/03/16 - 'I certainly wouldn't want to be sat with someone next to me who pays a fraction of the price'.
So why the price difference for members/non members?
What a mess. Again.
It's almost like we're run by people who don't really know what they're doing and don't really know anything about football and don't really know anything at all and don't really just won't sell up and **** off.
What a complete and utter shambles from both clubs.
How Man U think its appropriate to charge away fans that much, especially when home fans will be paying less is an absolute joke, they have ensured the away end will not be full. We should charge them the same for their visit, keeping the prices for home fans as they are, its only fair.
Hull City have managed to alienate two sets of season ticket holders at once, the North and Upper West, both of which will reconsider going reducing an already depleted crowd. The Upper West will be opened if the attendance against Newcastle is anything to go by, therefore you're displacing a group of supporters (for the second time in a few months) for absolutely no reason. The ticket prices for the home leg are okay for adult season members, its a complete rip-off for everyone else and an absolute joke for kids.
Don't forget the home fans will have their air fares to fork out for as wellAs ever, this ticket situation is totally confusing. How can Man U charge more for away fans? Don't they have to charge the same for equivalent seats?
If only someone had pointed out these sort of issues when the move was suggested.
As ever, this ticket situation is totally confusing. How can Man U charge more for away fans? Don't they have to charge the same for equivalent seats?
£10 for a kid to go to Old Trafford yet £18-30 at the KCom, **** Off
Just looking at Man Utd's website and it says they have different price bands for different seats. Bands A-I with prices from £31-£53 so they aren't charging us more than all home fans
Though some people should realise that the ruling on 10%or 3,000 tickets for PL games means that ny stadium holding over 30,000 will see fans not able to have their usual seats. If Cup fever means that we take our full allocation of 7,500 like others have done then 4,500Man Utd fans can't have their usual seat.
I think everyone does know that, what they're annoyed about here is that the Upper West fans are been moved for absolutely no reason and the North Stand fans are being moved to allocate Man U more tickets than we need to.
People can accept it when they have to move to for a reason, people are annoyed because there is absolutely no reason to move anyone for this game.
Which is why I mentioned, there is no need re North Stand, and why do it when they could have had loads more Newcastle fans in a half empty stadium but resolutely refused to do so?
What a sad indictment of what the Allams have brought about when our first ever League Cup semi-final against Man Utd has at the beginning of the announcement bout ticket the statement about tickets not being available for the West Stand Upper not being open until the lower bowl is sold. Can you think of any other club where it wouldn't be automatically presumed it would be a sell out, let alone one with a relatively small ground? There are a host of Championship clubs with larger grounds which would have problems coping with demand.