You're nicked

There does seem to be a concerted effort to have a go at me here.
You bum-boys been PMing each other again? Bless.
 
There does seem to be a concerted effort to have a go at me here.
You bum-boys been PMing each other again? Bless.

They don't need to tell you that, its called private messaging for a reason

On a serious note though, I can understand why people (whitejock) talk to you on here the way they do, I don't think its your views whatsoever but more to do with the way you come across
 
Hey, we all have our own personalities. WJs is that as long as I agree with him, he is okay. As soon as we disagree, he takes it personal and I'm quite happy to reciprocate.

If people on here can't accept other's ways rather than the message it's their problem

As for my rhetorical question, thanks for the added value reply <ok>

Yeah. Sarcasm. Bazynga!
 
There does seem to be a concerted effort to have a go at me here.
You bum-boys been PMing each other again? Bless.
I told you a few days ago that you are probably disliked on here more than anyone I know (even more than Clivetime was, at least he never talked down to people in the manner in which you do). You had a go back at me claiming you didn't know I spoke on behalf of others, I replied I don't just reading the posts it doesn't take much effort to work out why so many people don't like you.

Do I believe in strict moderation - NO
Do I believe this forum would be a better place without you on it - YES
Have I ever PM'd asking for you to be banned or others on here in an effort to gang up on you - NO
Do I believe your presence often puts others off posting sometimes - YES

So face the facts, your aggressive condescending style is not welcomed by many, there is no need for anyone to 'gang' up on you, you make your own enemies yourself. You attempt to be controversial for the love of an argument not because of a true belief, your double standards show and prove that.
 
"no-one likes me, I don't care "

Which part of that don't you understand?

I'm here to debate lufc. And if that means you can't accept that,it's your problem <ok>
 
I don't think there is any need for that style of paragraph there Ristac. Sheldon's way is probably not the best for being liked or getting his point across but I don't think that you should be so blunt about the subject
 
I don't think there is any need for that style of paragraph there Ristac. Sheldon's way is probably not the best for being liked or getting his point across but I don't think that you should be so blunt about the subject
I think they can handle it Josh, if they can't and the truth hurts then they should think first, a quick sample (not all aimed at me) over the last few posts, believe me I could give a lot more and these DON'T include the condescending remarks made by them that are littered through the forum. When their back is against the wall they like to call it debate <ok>:

Whitejock- very mature <applause> exactly the type of thing that would be written by a Grade A dickhead.

Sheldon said:
You're an uneducated inconsequence. My 3-year-old has a greater level of intelligence than you.

Sheldon said:
As a generalisation of all Leeds fans he was wrong. But in describing you as a "vile animal" and "scum", I have to agree that he wasn't too wide of the mark, ristac.

Sheldon said:
Thanks for your usual hgh-class contribution, rsitac. Back to your knuckle dragging and wife-beating.

Sheldon said:
I feel really sorry for anyone that actually knows you ifthis is what you are like outside the virtual world. You refuse to acknowledge anything else is possible. You really are a complete prick

"the filth" You are filthy with such a deranged attitude.

Whitejock - you proving what a cock you are again?

I don't know why you think it is so clever that you constantly ask people about the charges in your pathetic attempt to have a go at them. Stop being such a ****er, OneLeeds You're acting like the type of ****er that LUFC really could do without
 
I really can't be bothered to look through and pull out all the posts I can find and compete with you ristac. If I could be bothered, I might add the context of the original post that led to such a response. <ok>

It is very interesting that you complain about someone merely giving you back what you give.

Bless.
 
I think they can handle it Josh, if they can't and the truth hurts then they should think first, a quick sample (not all aimed at me) over the last few posts, believe me I could give a lot more and these DON'T include the condescending remarks made by them that are littered through the forum. When their back is against the wall they like to call it debate <ok>:

<laugh> point made I suppose


EDIT: 5000th post by the way <party>