Off Topic YOUR VOTE COUNTED...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

ON 23rd of June which way are you going to vote?.

  • IN

    Votes: 28 43.8%
  • OUT

    Votes: 34 53.1%
  • DON'T KNOW

    Votes: 4 6.3%

  • Total voters
    64
  • Poll closed .
Paul Nurse: 'Research needs free movement to thrive'
By Pallab GhoshScience correspondent, BBC News
Share
You must log in or register to see images
Image copyrightSPL
A leading scientist has said UK science will suffer unless any post-Brexit agreement allows the free movement of people.

Prof Sir Paul Nurse said the country's research was facing its biggest threat in living memory.

He added that researchers had to have a big voice in negotiations with the EU.

But Leave campaigners say the UK should be able to negotiate a deal to continue to receive European funding and still curb overall immigration.

British science was one of the biggest winners from EU funding. And so it is among those that have most to lose.

UK universities receive 10% of their research funding from the EU, amounting to just over £1bn a year.

Full membership of the funding body requires participating countries to allow free movement of people.

Sir Paul Nurse said that exit from the EU jeopardised the world-class science for which the UK was known.

It risked damaging the economy and could lead to a loss of skills and talent.

"For science to thrive it must have access to the single market, and we do need free movement," he said.

"We could negotiate that outside the EU, which will probably end up costing more money and we would have little influence [in deciding research priorities].

"Or perhaps we should just reconsider this entire mess and see if there is something that can be done to reconsider this once the dust has settled."

The Nobel Prize-winning scientist added that even if the government agreed to reimburse the lost funds, which Leave campaigners had suggested might be possible, it would not replace the important international collaborations that British science needed to remain at the forefront of research.

You must log in or register to see images

Image captionSir Paul Nurse says science will fail to thrive unless free movement is maintained
But Leave campaigners, such as Chris Leigh, from Scientists for Britain, say that there are several ways for the UK to negotiate a deal to continue to receive grants from the main European research programme, called Horizon 2020, and still stop free movement.

He said: "The first involves H2020 access for members of the European Free Trade Association, and, in the case of Norway, Switzerland and Iceland, this does appear to be linked to free movement.

"The second involves countries whose H2020 access is covered by the EU's Neighbourhood Policy, such as Israel, Tunisia, Georgia and Armenia, and this does not appear to require free movement.

"We also note that the current 'partial-access' status of Switzerland has opened up a third option, in that Swiss scientists have full access to Tier 1 H2020 activities, but participate in other aspects of H2020 (Tier 2/3) as a third country, but do so by funding their involvement directly.

"We would, however, urge our own government to recognise the importance of researcher mobility to science, and recommend that any future arrangements should ensure that scientists and students from around the world are still encouraged to visit, study and work in the UK."

British Universities employ about 30,000 scientists from EU countries.

The president of the Royal Society, which represents the UK's leading scientists, Sir Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, said many of them were now facing an uncertain future and so may choose to work elsewhere.

He said: "They are not just statistics; they are people worried about their job security.

"Government needs to act quickly to ensure that these researchers know that their jobs are safe.

"Universities have employed them because they are the brightest and the best, and other countries will know that and will come and get them."

Dr Noemie Bouhana, 40, a French researcher who arrived in the UK 18 years ago, lectures in crime science at UCL and leads an EU-funded project to track terrorism and the radicalisation of young men, involving collaborators across Europe.

She said: "Never in a million years would I get funding from central UK funds for this type of project, which is international, interdisciplinary and involves a mix of engineering and social sciences.

"I was shocked and disappointed when I heard the referendum result.

"At first, I did not believe it.

"I checked on several websites to see if it really was true.

"I then knew that I would not be in an EU country, and I hadn't realised how important that was to me, and I don't want to live in a non-EU country."

Mike Galsworthy, of pro-Remain campaign group Scientists for EU, said the country's current full relationship with the EU brought huge added value for UK science "from our strong policy voice on academic and single market standards through to leading roles on the EU multinational research programme".

He added: "We want to keep as much as possible, but, as the case of Switzerland showed us, negotiations will be complex.

"Much policy voice will be lost, and our renegotiated level of access will revolve around freedom of movement, the relationship with the single market, financial contributions and the interests of the remaining countries."
I've always said that the repercussions of this will go far deeper than any short-term economic phenomena. A lot of people simply can't see outside of their own small circle of experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moreinjuredthanowen
I've always said that the repercussions of this will go far deeper than any short-term economic phenomena. A lot of people simply can't see outside of their own small circle of experience.

We are trying to disentangle 40+ years of relationships, some of them forged after a lot of effort. Much more difficult that to put a X on a ballot paper to "kick some ass" or to "stop the uncontrolled movement of migrants". For the guy struggling on a minmum wage or homeless or unemployed, why should he help maintain these relationships?
 
Conservative leadership race: First round of voting closes

You must log in or register to see images

Tory MPs' voting has closed in the first round of the contest to replace David Cameron as leader and UK prime minister - with the result due shortly.
 
Conservative leadership race: First round of voting closes

You must log in or register to see images

Tory MPs' voting has closed in the first round of the contest to replace David Cameron as leader and UK prime minister - with the result due shortly.
Liam Fox is out.

Next out will be Crabb. He will probably pull out to speed things up.
 
Oh may was picked the moment Cameron resigned. Gove backstabbed and frankly.... after that.... well the hierarchy picked may and this is all for show and increasing profile.

Leadsom is just being positioned in minds as a future senior minister or whatever. This thing has nothing to do with democracy. It's all show.

Gove is toast.
 
May 165 of 329
Leadsom 66
Gove 48
Crabb 34
Fox 16

Fox eliminared, Crabb pulled out; both have given their support to May. She looks most likely right now.

May wouldn't be feeling too smug at the moment. In the last 20 years, the membership - these nice Tory folk - have often selected the opposite to the overwhelming MP favourite. they chose Hague and IDS instead of Ken clarke.

They may choose Leadsom since she appears more right wing.
 
****.. the Asians have got the jitters and the pounds down to 1.29 to the dollar and all sorts is going on.

The real news hasn't been ignored in favour of the tory smokescreen..... look at the bbc news... watch at 8am
 
Tory leadership race: May takes big lead as Fox and Crabb drop out .
Who is Crabb supporters going to support?.
Dirty politics !.<laugh>


I would expect Crabb's supporters to go for May. Fox's would go for Leadsom.

But this is really dirty stuff. Leadsom's and Gove's at each other's throats as they know once they are in the final two they've got a good chance. That Tory membership electorate is the most unpredictable of all. All the need to do is persuade their MP colleagues who are also among the most devious people on the planet.
 
Leadsom - who?

Crabb - some Welsh homophobe

Gove - a Nazi

Fox - who?

May - the winner by default and a remain campaigner who's already decided she's altered her opinion.

Is it any wonder the UK electorate is completely pissed off with the current party politics?
 
Leadsom - who?

Crabb - some Welsh homophobe

Gove - a Nazi

Fox - who?

May - the winner by default and a remain campaigner who's already decided she's altered her opinion.

Is it any wonder the UK electorate is completely pissed off with the current party politics?

I've never seen British politics at such a disgracefully low level - across the ****ing board. It's a ****ing midden.
 
I've never seen British politics at such a disgracefully low level - across the ****ing board. It's a ****ing midden.
Yep. An absolute quagmire of career monkeys trying to position themselves and forgetting about what they actually believe in at the drop of a ****ing hat.

It's never been as bad in my lifetime, I find it both nauseating and thoroughly embarrassing for the Nation.
 
My grandad was born in Dumfries, and my grandma in Cork. I've got options. Just worried that my pension will be paid in sterling when you see it plummeting like a fat wood pigeon wearing diving boots.