sorry mate I cant agree with you on that score, he should be allowed to carry on earning a wage no matter what profession he is in be it a bin man or a footballer. Just because he is earning bucket loads of cash and he is in the media spotlight should not have an effect on his livelihood until either the case begins or the result of the case determines so.
sure, if it was just her then money could be the point. however, their is a child in the equation. I cant see any mother staying with someone who they believe is a **** - especially as she is going to get buckets of cash regardless of whether she stays with him during the interim or not.
You sir are wrong! So whats he paid, £60,000.00 a week? perhaps more? he can do pretty much whatever he wants as he has been earning a considerable sum of money for what 7-10 years. If he is guilty he gets a year and a half of earning an obscene amount of money until his trial takes place! A year and a half - 78 weeks at £60k = £4.68m The judical system is a joke for allowing his trial to be put back for such a period. Sunderland are a joke for paying and playing him. His in a enviable position of being a footballer, someone that kids look up to (hopefully from afar). With a job like this comes responsibility. he should not earn that type of money in the meantime and what the courts should apply is a deduction in pay to the minimum wage whilst we wait for a trial. If he is then found innocent, big if, then he there should be a system in place where he can make a claim for loss of earnings due to false allegations and the young lady should be legally prosecuted. If I was earning over £4m a year, id probably be pretty much innocent of anything as well, even murder, might do a year behind bars but id be out on house arrest #Oscarp I hope his scumbag solicitor sleeps well at night on a bed full of money!
So what you're saying is guilty until proven innocent? that is exactly what you are saying above. If he has done nothing wrong other than cheating on his wife/girlfreiend or whatever she is then why should he be stripped of his wage? Why should he be made to suffer if all he's done wrong is shagged a lass? I met a girl in a nightclub when I was 20. Didn't ask her age just did what we used to in those days - first inkling I had of her age was when CID knocked on my door a couple of weeks later - turned out she was only 15. After an interview where she said I knew her age and I told them I didn't I was allowed free with no charge - by your reckoning I am guilty! I also cheated on my ex wife - I should be arrested immediately and fired from my job at the NHS!
Your a scumbag! Cheating is dispicable, not illegal but disgusting nontheless. AJ's wife was preggars too, adding to disgust!
That was in the past - I cheated then but have been completely faithful to my now wife - the one mentioned before is now my ex-wife as we were both cheating on each other (although me twice with a random lass I met and her numerous times with the lad I used to go out drinking with every week!) - not exactly the most amicable of marriages though and an eye for an eye and all that - very quick to judge when you don;t know a whole story aren't you!
Not really. It will take more than a single Mag win to take bragging rights after the year on year pounding we've given you. Try 5 in a row just to take the smug grin off my face. That's what you're clearly not getting. You can't win even if you win. Silly sod
Lol, i keep hearing you guys say 5, like the 5 we smashed past you! You have given us a righ pounding over the last couple of years, a couple of 1-0's add a 2-1 into that too! Torn apart! thats got to be worse than being smshaed 5-1
I think it's naive at this point to think Johnson is completely innocent. Nobody lets a case get this far if they can categorically disprove an accusation, I'm more than confident to say he's been involved with her in some capacity, it all just depends on whether she's fluffed the truth up to the point where she can rake in a load of extra cash. This is only my slant on it of course, I actually think he'll get away with it because a good barrister will pick apart any statement/testimony and rip the prosecution to pieces. I've had first hand experience in being shredded by a barrister and it's the most uncomfortable place to be in, before she knows it, this girl or her representative could be demolished in front of a courtroom and the entire thing will start to look farcical. That's why some solicitors cost £50 per hour and others thousands of pounds. I won't ever believe this guy is innocent, no matter what happens in that court room, because my judgement tells me he's a top of the range dickhead and the hat just seems to fit, very nicely.
If he is innocent - how do you categorically prove that she didn't tell you she was 15 in conversation? You can't - if there was any clear evidence I reckon the courts would've already had him in and the prosection service would've served it's evidence. I think they're hoping for others to come forward. Just an opinion mind! I think he's shagged her - have no doubt of that - but I reckon she was hoping for a pay-off (or her Dad was) from a rich bloke. If he's guilty (and I will believe it only once the verdict is passed in court, not with all the hearsay and conjecture that you hear in the press) then **** him - he can rot and I hope the club sue him for the remainder of his contract!! Oh and he's a complete prick of an individual - doesn;t mean he's guilty of sex with a minor
The only substantial rumour I've heard is that she was part of a group of youths who play down the club in some capacity... if that's the truth, then he'll have no chance of disproving that. Could be all bollocks mind.
See above mate, if that rumour turns out to be true he's in it up to his neck. Could be ****, could be furthest from the truth... either way, a good barrister will get you time to build a defense. Knowing how barristers work, he'll com armed with 100 other cases of people in his exact situation that have not been prosecuted. After that, a good barrister will walk out having cleaned up a massive mess. Like I say, I think he'll get off, but I don't think getting off will make him innocent.
No we say it 5 as in 5 in a row. I go from when we started our streak. not in the time bracket you decide. please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
I heard a similar rumour but it was a group of youths aged between 14 and 18 who were invited by the club - again puts the argument into doubt. Only time will tell - I agree I think he'll be found not guilty - if he's guilty - he can rot in jail after he's paid the club back!
You re-define the phrase 'judgemental'. You must live a flawless exemplary life, with a pure soul and spiritual purity of thought. Oh, except for the sanctimonious judgemental bit
To be fair to Toon Man Sam... if Newcastle beat you lot, the bragging rights are theirs for sure. 5 in a row means nowt. Just like their 5-1 meant **** all when you went and pasted them at St James Park. We trashed City last time out, they ain't going around chatting about 6-1 anymore... although they are the Champions... that probably helps! I reckon it'll be a draw for you lot, the bragging rights will remain with Sunderland in that case.
