World war 3

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
It appears if things get really bad (and they will, they will, if Brexit isn't stopped) what you are all saying is we need a strong leader

Not strong and stable, the sort who really puts the Jews in their place

Sorry, I meant Muslims not Jews

And gays, and lefties, and parliamentary democrats, enemies of the people, the BBC, the mainstream media (whatever that means) ..... they should all look out
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whitejock
2020VisionofLeeds said:
It appears if things get really bad (and they will, they will, if Brexit isn't stopped) what you are all saying is we need a strong leader

Not strong and stable, the sort who really puts the Jews in their place

Sorry, I meant Muslims not Jews

And gays, and lefties, and parliamentary democrats, enemies of the people, the BBC, the mainstream media (whatever that means) ..... they should all look out
Click to expand...
and the :afro: <whistle>
 
lifecheshirewhite said:
If I abused Rooney to his face,wouldn't blame him for having a go back.and as for you calling TR a thug,I believe he's within his right to defend himself if he feels under threat.
Click to expand...
He's not, you know. But that's a legal argument and not for here. The fact is, he went over the score. Even if he did 'defend himself', and there is NO evidence to support this, he went far and above what's allowed. Laying into someone who's rendered defenceless is not 'defending yourself'. And you would realise if you lifted the mist & studied it objectively. If this had been Corbyn, you'd be calling out for him to be jailed, based on exactly the same (lack of) evidence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2020VisionofLeeds
Whitejock said:
I'm not the one that's obsessive, Leedsloser!

Oh, and I see that you can actually respond to my posts, but oddly enough, it's only when you have some more of your racist guff to promote. What happened your standard responses, which appear to suggest that you have an anal bestiality fixation?

Why should I reply to your treatises when you don't do me the courtesy of responding to mine?

Would you prefer if I posted a picture of an animals bum so you can go have a tug over it?

I think my responses have already been posted by 2020, and very sensible and objective they are too.

Funny how Tommy the Tit had the bus drivers name come up when the driver called him, eh?
Funny how the driver wouldn't allow him on the bus & he had to make his own way home, eh?
Funny how the bus driver stated clearly in the newspaper that he didn't see who threw the first punch, yet your 'analyst' effectively claims that it was the other guy.
Funny how we saw Tommy the Tit keep laying into the guy when he was totally defenceless.
Funny how we don't see the other guy lay one punch.
Defending himself? I don't think so.
He's simply underlining the fact that he's the thug that he always has been.
And you fell for it. Again.
Totally indefensible behaviour on his part. And yours. <doh>
Click to expand...

So the Baboons bum upset you then......:emoticon-0136-giggl

Funny how you don't mention how Tommy looked behind him twice on cam and the other guy was following him.

Funny how we saw Tommy teaching the other guy a lesson, and the guy wasn't good enough to respond.

Funny how Tommy waited for him to get up so he could belt him again.

Funny how you're resorting to childish very low value insults cos you're on the back foot, again.

Try to put the flames out on your way down.

Your obsessive weaknesses are glowing bright red....:emoticon-0130-devil
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLOF and lifecheshirewhite
Whitejock said:
He's not, you know. But that's a legal argument and not for here. The fat is, he went over the score. Even if he did 'defend himself', and there is NO evidence to support this, he went far and above what's allowed. Laying into someone who's rendered defenceless is not 'defending yourself'. And you would realise if you lifted the mist & studied it objectively. If this had been Corbyn, you'd be calling out for him to be jailed, based on exactly the same (lack of) evidence.
Click to expand...
Corbyn been going on about overthrowing the government,well rioters tried to put it into practice last night,and Corbyn should be in jail for incitement to riot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLOF
LeedsLover said:
I like the way you go in deep 2020, but stop drowning yourself,lol.

Thing is, second video said there was a longer video, other than the one cut down and edited, so to get the full truth we'll have to wait for that one, if it ever surfaces.

Irrespective of what some may think of Tommy Robinson, he stands up for Britain and it's people, we don't see the Government, or the Labour party doing a lot for the people. He never backs down and always comes back ready to go again, when many would've given up, he ain't giving up.

He's an inspiration to a lot of people in Britain, and his popularity is spreading overseas, his support and following is continually growing, both young and old, and the marches are getting bigger and bigger.

The videos and Chesh are right, Tommy is getting it from both sides, the Muslims hate him cos he speaks the truth, they fear the backlash of him getting so much support that the tide turns against them, and it is. Even in Europe, USA, Russia and some parts of Africa the tide is starting to slowly turn. People have had enough, and the people look to TR for inspiration and Leadership, and I admire him for giving it to them with a never say die attitude. More and more people are standing up and voicing their feelings on behalf of other Brits, and I include Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen alongside Tommy.

Tommy cops it from the media and Antif and other blind boz eyed groups that oppose him, they try to stitch him up by not reporting the truth, only publishing half truths, and editing anything that makes Tommy and Co look bad, but they don't want to see what he stands for and is trying to do for his Country.

What a lot of Politicians, Fleet Street, councils, some members of Antifa etc don't seem to realise is, the muslims don't care how left, how far left, how right, or how far right or whether they're in the middle or not, they don't give a damn, if they're a non believer then they're an infidel and they want them as slaves or dead as well.

Muslims have also said, they'll turn Buckingham Palace into a Mosque and the Queen must convert to Islam or get out, so bloody backward, not a hope in hell, as they'll find out when they get there.

Remember when many said Enoch Powell was wrong, he turned out to be right, and in present day, he turned out to be right again.

The tides are turning around the World against Islam takeovers....glug, glug, glug, glug..,lol.
Click to expand...
You forgot to finish with Zeig Heil! <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2020VisionofLeeds
Whitejock said:
He's not, you know. But that's a legal argument and not for here. The fat is, he went over the score. Even if he did 'defend himself', and there is NO evidence to support this, he went far and above what's allowed. Laying into someone who's rendered defenceless is not 'defending yourself'. And you would realise if you lifted the mist & studied it objectively. If this had been Corbyn, you'd be calling out for him to be jailed, based on exactly the same (lack of) evidence.
Click to expand...

Like you said, there's lack of evidence regarding who started what, so you have no grounds for an argument.
 
OLOF said:
What, defending himself,? i'd have done exactly the same, he should have given Piers Moron the same treatment
Click to expand...
See previous posts. There is ZERO evidence to support this notion. ZERO. There is a lot of noise and a lot of hope, but no evidence, other than a video that shows a thug laying into a guy that cannot defend himself. Ask yourself why the bus driver wouldn't let Tommy Mosley back on the bus & he had to make his own way home. Indeed it was reported from eyewitnesses that he 'ran away'. Sound like a man with a stout defence?
 
Whitejock said:
He's not, you know. But that's a legal argument and not for here. The fat is, he went over the score. Even if he did 'defend himself', and there is NO evidence to support this, he went far and above what's allowed. Laying into someone who's rendered defenceless is not 'defending yourself'. And you would realise if you lifted the mist & studied it objectively. If this had been Corbyn, you'd be calling out for him to be jailed, based on exactly the same (lack of) evidence.
Click to expand...

Spot on
 
Whitejock said:
See previous posts. There is ZERO evidence to support this notion. ZERO. There is a lot of noise and a lot of hope, but no evidence, other than a video that shows a thug laying into a guy that cannot defend himself. Ask yourself why the bus driver wouldn't let Tommy Mosley back on the bus & he had to make his own way home. Indeed it was reported from eyewitnesses that he 'ran away'. Sound like a man with a stout defence?
Click to expand...

Wasn't it also reported that witnesses said this guy was having a go at Tommy and his family throughout most of the day......I think it was.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OLOF and lifecheshirewhite
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back