Match Day Thread World Cup match day thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Yes I rember how vocal you were about the benefits <laugh>
I still like it, tonight’s farce was due to a ****, piss weak ref. If it’s used to aid a strong good referee it works well in the main. There’s been plenty of games were it’s ensured the right decisions and thus the right result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and Diego
I still like it, tonight’s farce was due to a ****, piss weak ref. If it’s used to aid a strong good referee it works well in the main. There’s been plenty of games were it’s ensured the right decisions and thus the right result.

I know you can't bear to be wrong, but admit it...it's **** <laugh>
 
The Spain goal was onside, so Var got that one right...and the remaining six decisions it either got wrong, or wasted time for nothing. So it's officially ****.
 
I know you can't bear to be wrong, but admit it...it's **** <laugh>
Haha, nah, how it’s used needs work, it’s still obviously far from perfect, but the basic principle of using replays to ensure that major refereeing **** ups are either minimised or eradicated has to be a good thing for the game at the top level imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
The Spain goal was onside, so Var got that one right...and the remaining six decisions it either got wrong, or wasted time for nothing. So it's officially ****.

Those of us against it have never said it won't correct some wrongs as it obviously will. It's just all the other **** that comes with it and the bad far outweighs the good imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
Yeah cos the trials so far with English refs haven't been Shambolic?

Like with anything, at the start that happens, and it takes time. The refs in the Prem may have their faults but they're a damned sight better than the clowns we had on show tonight.

The English refs will be watching this I'm sure and learning from it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
The problem is with people saying it's down to the person using it is the standard of refereeing is pretty poor so it's not going to work.

Should focus more on improving refereeing standards imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
Like with anything, at the start that happens, and it takes time. The refs in the Prem may have their faults but they're a damned sight better than the clowns we had on show tonight.

The English refs will be watching this I'm sure and learning from it.

Well it's not in the PL next year anyway just the cups at PL grounds i think and hopefully we've gone down by the time it comes in.
 
Those of us against it have never said it won't correct some wrongs as it obviously will. It's just all the other **** that comes with it and the bad far outweighs the good imo.


Well exactly. It slows the game down, undermines the officials, and solves nothing in the way of controversy. The best refs in this WC have been the ones who have ****ed it off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
Haha, nah, how it’s used needs work, it’s still obviously far from perfect, but the basic principle of using replays to ensure that major refereeing **** ups are either minimised or eradicated has to be a good thing for the game at the top level imo.

Were never going to agree on this one mate. I'll have a wager that in 5 years they will have to reduce each half to 40 mins because of the constant stoppages and in 10 years it will be exactly the same as American football, where not only will VAR generate constant stoppages in the game, the TV companies will negotiate these stoppages to go to commercial breaks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
I still like it, tonight’s farce was due to a ****, piss weak ref. If it’s used to aid a strong good referee it works well in the main. There’s been plenty of games were it’s ensured the right decisions and thus the right result.
Spot on, this is where people show total lack of understanding of what is going on. VAR doesn't make any decisions, the ref makes them all still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
The bit I don’t get is why it takes so long for the bods in the booth to tell the ref he should look at it, for him to then jog to the halfway line to spend a minute watching, to then award the pen, to then deal with the other team protesting, to then tell the goalkeeper to get onto his line and the players to leave the box. If you can’t reverse your decision in 30 seconds it’s not conclusive enough to bother. Just get on with the game.
 
The problem is with people saying it's down to the person using it is the standard of refereeing is pretty poor so it's not going to work.

Should focus more on improving refereeing standards imo.

That's besides the point. The purpose of VAR is to give decisions the refs will always invariably miss. No amount of improvement will prevent that.
 
I still like it, tonight’s farce was due to a ****, piss weak ref. If it’s used to aid a strong good referee it works well in the main. There’s been plenty of games were it’s ensured the right decisions and thus the right result.

if the ref is **** then VAR is going to make him look a right ****. it doesn't look good at this tournament and if we get it in our league with the **** refs we have now the game will be longer than American Football.

perhaps that's why they are bringing it in so the septics can get their adverts in.