You're confused between performance and resut DT. Give your head quick shake

Agree mate. Apparently the second half had lots of positives. Losing 2-1 though is not a great result, it's like saying winning 2-1 is a terrible result!! Just trying to help DT comprehend what he's saying.Whatever about whether it was a great or good result or performance, I take a lot of encouragement out of the fact that we fought back after going 2-0 down against the runaway league leaders and could have come away with a point in the end.
5-0 = 0 pointsI fully expected us to leak 4/5 goals today as I mentioned before kick off such is the menace of this current Wolves side
5-0 is a bad result
2-1 is a good result
A good result is keeping the result respectable same as you would get in a cup match. Performance has nothing to do with luck and believe me we were ripped apart by Wolves at times making the final score of a 2-1 a very good result
5-0 = 0 points
2-1 = 0 points
Get it? Probably not, as you're incredibly full of yourself.
Agree mate. Apparently the second half had lots of positives. Losing 2-1 though is not a great result, it's like saying winning 2-1 is a terrible result!! Just trying to help DT comprehend what he's saying.
From the 30 seconds or so they showed on channel 5 we were pulled wide apart for their 2nd goal have to give them credit for movement etc but we looked ok after that just a shame Eze didn't put his laces through the ball instead of trying to place it....
Every used the term keeping the score line down would be a great result ?
Against the best team in this division we have scored 3 and conceded 3 over two matches we got three points both games were good results
In a league every team cannot win every match hence a defeat by one goal can be deemed as a good result ... performance is not always related to result
Full of myself or not this is correct
When people are looking for a negative they will find it regardless
Stream wasn't up at the start and it doesnt give good overviews anyway. But I think it was 4-5-1 that morphed into the more usual lopsided 3-5-2 2nd half when Perch had gone off and Robinson moved back into a 3 with Ned and Lynch. Bidwell moved forward of the 3 on the left, but far less than Pawel managed on the right. Eze seemed to start wide left but moved into a 10 role just behind the 2 strikers and began to influence the game from there. Not surprisingly our best stuff was played through the middle and down the right with Pawel.Glad to hear it mate. Out of curiosity, what was the starting formation and what was it changed to?
But I think you're forgetting that it wasn't just 0 points, it was a GREAT 0 points.I reckon the negative of today might just be that we got 0 points.
Didn’t have to look far for that one.
Good performance though, so I’ve been told.
I'm sure you believe your own **** DT. Let's hope for some more great 2-1 loss results then hey. You really do make me chuckle with your posts.
I watched the entire game in HD and Wolves made us look very stupid as they are very fluid ... it’s was clever European football against an English system with no answersStream wasn't up at the start and it doesnt give good overviews anyway. But I think it was 4-5-1 that morphed into the more usual lopsided 3-5-2 2nd half when Perch had gone off and Robinson moved back into a 3 with Ned and Lynch. Bidwell moved forward of the 3 on the left, but far less than Pawel managed on the right. Eze seemed to start wide left but moved into a 10 role just behind the 2 strikers and began to influence the game from there. Not surprisingly our best stuff was played through the middle and down the right with Pawel.
Didn’t forest go to molineux and have a go and win a couple of weeks ago ? That’s what I would call a great result .
Didn’t watch the game but let me have a guess we set up like we did against Bristol city and Boro a couple of weeks ago . 5 at the back and conceding oceans of space in the midfield . Effectively giving the game up before we have a go to try and get something out of it . People see this and managerial genius . Personally see us making the same mistakes week in week out .
If personnel and changes reap benefit then why do we keep making the same mistakes . Sat was a free game and should have had a go from the start . Then you never know what may happen !