Winter transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Scout73 said:
Talent wise I'd love Clarke back however I hate having loads of loan players in match day squads if we signed him and Le Fee on loan that would mean we would have 5

Mepham
Samed
Isidor
Le Fee
Clarke

Rumours are that the striker might be a loan move as well

I'd be delighted to get Clarke back (I wouldn't if Mundle and Watson were both fit but I think mundle injury is a lot worse than they 1st thought and might not be back until march) but only if a loan was made permanent - ididor or Mepham probably

I don't blame Clarke for leaving but Harte has got to advise him better imo. Ipswich weren't a good fit for him, their wingers play narrow and it takes away everything that is good in Clarkes game. Clarke has already had a failed move to a PL side and this is looking like another one. I've watched him a few times and at times he's done pretty well but others he looks totally lost. Players are obsessed with playing in the PL but imo they should be looking at whether the club is the best for them to showcase their skills

I think Clarke will stay at Ipswich and I really hope he shows his true ability before the season finishes
Click to expand...

Isidor and Mepham are surely just formalities aren't they? We have an option to buy on Isidor at a bargain price and he loves it here. Mepham I believe is out of contract in the summer so that should just be a case of giving him an acceptable contract in the summer.

I'd take Clarke back too, though I don't think it's on the cards. He's an upgrade on Mundle still and adding those goals to this team would make us promotion favourites (along with Le Fee).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Whittylad
Flash Gordon said:
Isidor and Mepham are surely just formalities aren't they? We have an option to buy on Isidor at a bargain price and he loves it here. Mepham I believe is out of contract in the summer so that should just be a case of giving him an acceptable contract in the summer.

I'd take Clarke back too, though I don't think it's on the cards. He's an upgrade on Mundle still and adding those goals to this team would make us promotion favourites (along with Le Fee).
Click to expand...
I think there’ll be loads of interest in Mepham. Hopefully we’re at the front of the queue
 
  • Like
Reactions: Young Ted
Flash Gordon said:
Isidor and Mepham are surely just formalities aren't they? We have an option to buy on Isidor at a bargain price and he loves it here. Mepham I believe is out of contract in the summer so that should just be a case of giving him an acceptable contract in the summer.

I'd take Clarke back too, though I don't think it's on the cards. He's an upgrade on Mundle still and adding those goals to this team would make us promotion favourites (along with Le Fee).
Click to expand...
I think Bournemouth have a club option of a yr so I won't be surprised if they activated so they got some money for him

I wouldn't be against Clarke rejoining but all depends on Mundle and Watsons injuries. If they are back soon then we will have 3 wingers for the same position, then only 1 starting calibre RM
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson and Young Ted
Scout73 said:
Talent wise I'd love Clarke back however I hate having loads of loan players in match day squads if we signed him and Le Fee on loan that would mean we would have 5

Mepham
Samed
Isidor
Le Fee
Clarke

Rumours are that the striker might be a loan move as well

I'd be delighted to get Clarke back (I wouldn't if Mundle and Watson were both fit but I think mundle injury is a lot worse than they 1st thought and might not be back until march) but only if a loan was made permanent - ididor or Mepham probably

I don't blame Clarke for leaving but Harte has got to advise him better imo. Ipswich weren't a good fit for him, their wingers play narrow and it takes away everything that is good in Clarkes game. Clarke has already had a failed move to a PL side and this is looking like another one. I've watched him a few times and at times he's done pretty well but others he looks totally lost. Players are obsessed with playing in the PL but imo they should be looking at whether the club is the best for them to showcase their skills

I think Clarke will stay at Ipswich and I really hope he shows his true ability before the season finishes
Click to expand...
We can only have 5 loans in a matchday squad (I think) and like you I don't want a load of loans, but Isisdor and Le Fee have pre agreed deals in place, so I don't really count them.

Just think it would give us even more attacking threat and more options for a huge run in
 
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns and Scout73
Scout73 said:
I wouldn't be against Clarke rejoining but all depends on Mundle and Watsons injuries. If they are back soon then we will have 3 wingers for the same position, then only 1 starting calibre RM
Click to expand...
I suppose Watson can play off the right but it’s far from ideal, he really struggled out there down at Preston in the league
 
  • Like
Reactions: Young Ted
Chunksafc said:
We can only have 5 loans in a matchday squad (I think) and like you I don't want a load of loans, but Isisdor and Le Fee have pre agreed deals in place, so I don't really count them.

Just think it would give us even more attacking threat and more options for a huge run in
Click to expand...
I reckon loan striker then a Harvey vale type on a perm and that’ll be us done on incomings unless we bring in a couple for the future too
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Professor, Robertson, Scout73 and 1 other person
Scout73 said:
I think Bournemouth have a club option of a yr so I won't be surprised if they activated so they got some money for him

I wouldn't be against Clarke rejoining but all depends on Mundle and Watsons injuries. If they are back soon then we will have 3 wingers for the same position, then only 1 starting calibre RM
Click to expand...

Could Mundle do a job on the right? I don't love the balance at all, don't get me wrong, but Clarke is as close to a guaranteed success here as we could get. I don't mind if Watson has to wait a little longer for his chance if it's promotion on 5 months.
 
Hudson92 said:
I reckon loan striker then a Harvey vale type on a perm and that’ll be us done on incomings unless we bring in a couple for the future too
Click to expand...
Be interesting to see how goes out either on loan or permanent as well.

Maybe some of the young lads that have been in and around bench will go on loan? Jones, Johnson etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hudson92
Flash Gordon said:
Could Mundle do a job on the right? I don't love the balance at all, don't get me wrong, but Clarke is as close to a guaranteed success here as we could get. I don't mind if Watson has to wait a little longer for his chance if it's promotion on 5 months.
Click to expand...
I believe he could. Certainly has the pace to go on the outside
 
  • Like
Reactions: DELETED ACCOUNT 1234
Flash Gordon said:
Could Mundle do a job on the right? I don't love the balance at all, don't get me wrong, but Clarke is as close to a guaranteed success here as we could get. I don't mind if Watson has to wait a little longer for his chance if it's promotion on 5 months.
Click to expand...
Imo, no I don't think he can - his natural game is cutting in on his stronger foot and that's his biggest strength

Yes he has the pace but so does Clarke and I don't think he would be good on the right either

We shouldn't shoehorn players into positions imo, it should be playing players in their natural positions - it's what will give us the success
 
  • Like
Reactions: DELETED ACCOUNT 1234, Jarca and Young Ted
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back