K
Kalman
Guest
McCann has been insulated from criticism for so long that he probably thinks he’s been doing an alright job, which is why the chants by City supporters about wanting him out probably hit a nerve for him.
The club has the best chance of succeeding by winning some matches. The fans "get behind the team" by caring about what happens to their football club!The club has the best chance of succeeding when the fans get behind the team and management
McCann has been insulated from criticism for so long that he probably thinks he’s been doing an alright job, which is why the chants by City supporters about wanting him out probably hit a nerve for him.
The club has the best chance of succeeding by winning some matches. The fans "get behind the team" by caring about what happens to their football club!
I don't think Burnsy can win , some people criticise him for not asking difficult questions
and somebody even thinks he was bullying McCann after we lost 8-0
I'm sure GM uses the league table as his yardstick not the mouthings of spotty know- nowts
I'm sure GM uses the league table as his yardstick not the mouthings of spotty know- nowts
For me he seems to love our demise, whether it is because he hates Ehab or supports Grimsby I’m not sure. Him and Swanny banging on about London away trips like it’s their personal trip on the piss annoys the fook out me. Stick the the commentary pal. Oh you can’t .
Burnsy isn't welcome more because of the players feelings as opposed to grants. They feel he looks to find issues even when they are doing well, some of his tweets during games, comments on the radio etc ( even when doing well last season after he had them down for a potential double relegation ) seemed to be looking for and hoping the players would fail. Add that to his almost ( they feel ) enjoyment and I told you so when things don't go well. Thats the main reason. Grant isn't a fan of him but took it as part of the job. Add it all together and the group just thought it better that his negativity wasn't allowed to be in around the camp when they felt he was just waiting and hoping for something to jump on.
Should the players and the club accept his feelings, views and style as part of the job? Probably... But burnsy has brought on his own downfall by the way he's acted rightly or wrongly.
Maybe this should just be used by the BBC to start a fresh with a new team to cover Hull and say thanks but goodbye to burnsy and swanny ? Let's face it the quality that we got from the ex pros last season on ifollow shows swanny up for just how poor he is
I’m sure he doesn’t because we finished 24th last time in the Championship and we’re currently in the bottom three and he’s still banging on about ‘trusting the formula’ and saying we play good football.
He’s deluded whichever angle you look at it.
He's ****ed then isn't he, he should resign based on your logic.I'm sure GM uses the league table as his yardstick not the mouthings of spotty know- nowts
That's interesting, especially as I would have said Burnsy's tweets would be positioned as fairly moderate when you consider the range of opinions you get on here (and we're relatively sane and balanced compared to some of the other City fan groups). Maybe selling himself as a fan rather than an impartial journalist goes down well with his listeners but not the players.Burnsy isn't welcome more because of the players feelings as opposed to grants. They feel he looks to find issues even when they are doing well, some of his tweets during games, comments on the radio etc ( even when doing well last season after he had them down for a potential double relegation ) seemed to be looking for and hoping the players would fail. Add that to his almost ( they feel ) enjoyment and I told you so when things don't go well. Thats the main reason. Grant isn't a fan of him but took it as part of the job. Add it all together and the group just thought it better that his negativity wasn't allowed to be in around the camp when they felt he was just waiting and hoping for something to jump on.
Should the players and the club accept his feelings, views and style as part of the job? Probably... But burnsy has brought on his own downfall by the way he's acted rightly or wrongly.
Maybe this should just be used by the BBC to start a fresh with a new team to cover Hull and say thanks but goodbye to burnsy and swanny ? Let's face it the quality that we got from the ex pros last season on ifollow shows swanny up for just how poor he is
He's ****ed then isn't he, he should resign based on your logic.
... And the quality of main commentary to any casual listener shows just how good Burnsy is in comparison. Couldn't give a fook about swanny mind.Burnsy isn't welcome more because of the players feelings as opposed to grants. They feel he looks to find issues even when they are doing well, some of his tweets during games, comments on the radio etc ( even when doing well last season after he had them down for a potential double relegation ) seemed to be looking for and hoping the players would fail. Add that to his almost ( they feel ) enjoyment and I told you so when things don't go well. Thats the main reason. Grant isn't a fan of him but took it as part of the job. Add it all together and the group just thought it better that his negativity wasn't allowed to be in around the camp when they felt he was just waiting and hoping for something to jump on.
Should the players and the club accept his feelings, views and style as part of the job? Probably... But burnsy has brought on his own downfall by the way he's acted rightly or wrongly.
Maybe this should just be used by the BBC to start a fresh with a new team to cover Hull and say thanks but goodbye to burnsy and swanny ? Let's face it the quality that we got from the ex pros last season on ifollow shows swanny up for just how poor he is
It was bullying the way he said it, and he wasn't speaking for the majority of fans at the time. There were a million and one things a journalist could have asked a manager after a club record 8-0 away defeat, but to hide his questions behind 'what the fans want' was cheap IMO. and since when was he made the fans spokesman ?Offering right of rely to the majority of fans calling for his head is hardly bullying.
i wasn't sure if this was deserving of a new thread but existing ones don't really cover this. His post match inteview on Wednesday was exactly the same as any other . The man just lacks the ability to be honest. He's so determined to hold on to this job that he's throwing any future management career away as a result. Why can't he say something like; We haven't spent any money and we finished the game tonight with only one player different from last season. The team is struggling and it's clear that we need fresh blood. The first opportunity to do that is in the January transfer window. If we don't strengthen then we are going to continue to struggle.
He wouldn't be lying and he isn't throwing Allam under the bus. He'd gain a massive boost in respect from those of us who pay to watch the team every week, and he'd also be seen as something other than the puppet he's allowed himself to become. It wouldn't make him a better manager but at least we'd know he can see what we see. He's become so suspicious of the media that it's ridiculous. The nonsense about refusing to discuss formation changes at Huddersfield was just laughable. Show some decency and integrity. It can't do anything but good. At the moment nothing he's doing is acting in the best interests of either himself or our club.
It was bullying the way he said it, and he wasn't speaking for the majority of fans at the time. There were a million and one things a journalist could have asked a manager after a club record 8-0 away defeat, but to hide his questions behind 'what the fans want' was cheap IMO. and since when was he made the fans spokesman ?
i wasn't sure if this was deserving of a new thread but existing ones don't really cover this. His post match inteview on Wednesday was exactly the same as any other . The man just lacks the ability to be honest. He's so determined to hold on to this job that he's throwing any future management career away as a result. Why can't he say something like; We haven't spent any money and we finished the game tonight with only one player different from last season. The team is struggling and it's clear that we need fresh blood. The first opportunity to do that is in the January transfer window. If we don't strengthen then we are going to continue to struggle.
He wouldn't be lying and he isn't throwing Allam under the bus. He'd gain a massive boost in respect from those of us who pay to watch the team every week, and he'd also be seen as something other than the puppet he's allowed himself to become. It wouldn't make him a better manager but at least we'd know he can see what we see. He's become so suspicious of the media that it's ridiculous. The nonsense about refusing to discuss formation changes at Huddersfield was just laughable. Show some decency and integrity. It can't do anything but good. At the moment nothing he's doing is acting in the best interests of either himself or our club.