It is like trying to debate a point with a three year old. Cisse is not a vast amount beter than Bendtner, Chamakh or Park. Everyone has this idea that the scale of players ability is soooo big and there is a gulf in class between players. It simply isn't the case, or Wigan would never be able to win a game against us, or Manchester United. There are only a very few players that are signicantly better than the average player in the premiership and talking abut Cisse as if he is on that elevated level with RVP, Ronaldo and Messi is as stupid as a bag of nuts.
Once you get past those few players that really elevate a team and all those around them, the rest are seperated by form, luck and how they fit into your system. The difference between Cisse and Bendtner in terms of ability, if there is any, could be out-weighed by whether the player playing alongside them is left or right-footed, or the usual state of their home pitch. Has anyone given any thought on how similar Cisse and Ba are in terms of style, and how different they are to any of our forwards, in terms of style?
I am sure you feel superior, saying that Cisse was an "obvious choice", and you think you are smarter because you think you are able to detect a flaw in a manager that has been managing at the top level for over 25 years. As I keep pointing out to you, the truth is that you don't have the knowledge of the game to even understand the framework of the decision, and every time you post you just show that.
As I have said before, I am reallly tired of trying to explain things to you and simply getting personal abuse back. Go ahead and insult me, it really makes no difference. I have tried to help you understand. If you want to carry on believing that you are all football geniuses and Wenger, his coaches and scouts are all fools, then have at it.
It seems obvious to me that the reverse is far more likely, but just have it your own way.