Wenger out.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I miss read the title for a minute, and thought it was going to be a knob thread,

Then i realised i'm kinda right.
 
****.
Arsenal may actually be good next season now......another team competing for the title, maybe
 
  • Like
Reactions: gooner4ever
Not sure I agree with this little snippet from Kroenke taken from the article.

"His longevity and consistency over such a sustained period at the highest level of the game will never be matched."

<rofl>
 
Matth_2014 said:
I don’t want to hear Arsenal fans moan next season if it doesn’t go their way.
Click to expand...

It won't go their way mate, the new guy will need a year to settle, at least.

Interesting to see when they announce who is joining. Surely they wouldn't release this info without already having a replacement?
 
Skylarker said:
It won't go their way mate, the new guy will need a year to settle, at least.

Interesting to see when they announce who is joining. Surely they wouldn't release this info without already having a replacement?
Click to expand...

Exactly, Surely they’ve got someone in place.
 
The Liebherr Legacy said:
Not sure I agree with this little snippet from Kroenke taken from the article.

"His longevity and consistency over such a sustained period at the highest level of the game will never be matched."

<rofl>
Click to expand...

Think Sir Alex may have something to say about that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman
Moggy For PM said:
20 consecutive CL qualifications is pretty consistent tbf.
Click to expand...
Consistently Meh.

Thats like saying I am consistent because I manage to walk without falling over on my face when I get up.

And thats not the part thats the issue, it was the part about his consistency and longevity not being matched.....well it has, and it has been bettered. <doh>

If they had said something like, "his consistency at the highest level over a long period of time was amazing" or something like that, then i wouldn't have an issue with it.
 
He was revolutionary in his early days. But the game always evolves, moves on, and he either didn’t or wouldn’t recognise that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Libby
The irony is that his managerial achievements are likely to be much more appreciated throughout the rest of the country than in the capital ...

3 EPL titles (including 2 doubles) and 7 FA Cups ... plus a team that went a whole league season unbeaten ... that is truly a phenomenal managerial record by anyone's standards <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueman, haslam, BobbyD and 2 others
FosseFilberto said:
The irony is that his managerial achievements are likely to be much more appreciated throughout the rest of the country than in the capital ...

3 EPL titles (including 2 doubles) and 7 FA Cups ... plus a team that went a whole league season unbeaten ... that is truly a phenomenal managerial record by anyone's standards <ok>
Click to expand...

Bit **** really<laugh>

Imagine moaning if that's all you've won.
 
Commachio said:
Bit **** really<laugh>

Imagine moaning if that's all you've won.
Click to expand...

To put that into real perspective ... over the same period Spurs and Liverpool combined (arguably clubs of similar size and expectation) have won 3 FA Cups (all Liverpool) ... OK Liverpool did have that 'winning' Champions League draw (penalties win) in 2005 (not forgetting that it came courtesy of a ghost goal in the semi) ... but just imagine how much Wenger would be getting pelters if he'd won a trophy in such a fluke fashion? ...

... but winning a league can never be fluke ... best over 38 games says it all and only United and Chelsea have bettered Arsenal under Wenger ... City have now equalled it but look at how much money they have needed to spend to do it <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back