No smoke without fire I hope as many reports this morning of Lorient Mesliers former club giving us back just short of what we paid for him and taking the kid home, I wish him well for his future. His future isn’t at Leeds

Probably would reflect that they likely had a sell on clause in their original deal, which would reduce any fee they had to pay if they bought him back (Trafford to Man City). Not always that the club is s***e at everything - though we do have form in some of our transfer dealingsNo smoke without fire I hope as many reports this morning of Lorient Mesliers former club giving us back just short of what we paid for him and taking the kid home, I wish him well for his future. His future isn’t at Leeds
.100% agree with this and suspect that much of the problems are around their contracts and wages. Meslier however if we sell for £5m all goes down as profit under PSR simply because his initial fee was amortised over 3 years so paid off. You would think that players like Greenwood contract expires next year so why no takers. Same with Gyabi, Harrison is 2028, Bamford into his last year, Gelhardt contract expires next June so he has basically been handed a free transfer so we lose out on at least £3m we could have had if he went Rangers but he refused and apparently refused a couple more moves. Me thinks agents are now telling players who are in their final year to refuse moves in the hope of getting a loan and walk away at the end with a free transfer which boosts their earnings next season for whoever they sign forWe are really poor at selling players. We paid £5 million for Meslier and he has nearly 200 appearances for us, 3 seasons in the PL, keeper of the season in the Championship 2 years ago and we will make a small loss on him. If he played for Brighton, Liverpool, Ipswich or Chelsea he'd be going for £35 million.
Maybe Betis will take him on loan if we pay them a couple of million.
If we get a couple of wingers in, then we have to send Ramazani on loan because we wont recoup the £10 million we spent on him.
We had to loan Wober because we couldn't get a measly £3 million for him.
He had a slow start but last season he played 32 games. 7 goals and 4 assists. He’s a RW who has also played at RWB.strikers...hhhmm, brentford splash out £40 mill on a cherries player who's scored 11 in 88 appearances.......not for me![]()
my bad.......he's not worth 40 mill neitherHe had a slow start but last season he played 32 games. 7 goals and 4 assists. He’s a RW who has also played at RWB.
He’s not a striker.
Sunderland had the day that dreams are made of. West Ham didnt take their chances, Sunderland shots went in. As Milky stated, it wasn't a 3-0 game, just a good day for Sunderland and one of those days for West Ham.
Spurs deservedly beat Burnley but Burnley weren't really played off the park. They were in the game for large parts and held their own for periods of the game.
Two contrasting days for two promoted clubs. Thats football for you. Someday the bounce of the ball goes your way.
We desperately need a day like Sunderland had today where we just get a bit of luck or a really good finish from someone. Get a win under the belt, breeds confidence to go on and hopefully get a few more points.
Love us both to stay up.
Spot on. West Ham Keeper had a meslier which helped sunderland too.
Burnley’s problem will be, they cant rely on defence on its own at this level - lady luck won't bail them out gainst better attackers. They hardly ever had to chase a game last year and they’re not really equipped for it.
It's what worries me about our 'big lad' strategy. We'll see how the game plan plays out in reality - it's supposition at the moment and i imgaine it may be horses for courses... but seems likely we'll be inviting pressure. You have to still give the opposition something to think about, and without attacking reinforcements i'm not sure where our threat will be.
We lack creativity in the team. We've nobody to play that killer pass that opens things up. Thats my concern.
Im not sure we will invite pressure in most games. In pre season against scum, Villareal and Milan we've had our fair share. Farke has definitely set up to attack in some halves and to sit in in others.
If we dont play with a 10 then we need something special out wide.
yeh fair point, invite was the wrong word, i meant if you offer no attacking threat you encourage sides to be more ambitious. I do expect us to try and retain posession rather than low block and hoof it away... just not sure how we do much with that possession. In the periods of time we don't have the ball i can see us getting hemmed in with no outlet. I guess it's why the no 9 who can hold the ball up and run the channels is critical.
Guess we all want that flashy winger, the slick 10 and the goal-scoring all round 9 we've been hankering after and not delivered on!
Very true regarding possession, I mentioned it as the commentary team said three good goals on the counter and West Ham had zero threat in front of goal.Possession means absolutely fook all, if you don’t do anything with it. We didn’t really let them create many clear cut opportunities. We had the much better chances and put them away.
Anything can happen yet. So many different scenarios… Potter could be sacked next month and then they could bring in a manager that gets them going again. They’ve got really good players and with the right manager they’d probably be fine. With Potter they’ll struggle.
I agree about our fixtures, we have been handed a great run to start the season. We need to capitalise on it. We should be hoping to take at least 4 points from Burnley and Brentford.
Coz we cant get what we want. We cant even dive into the Championship and pick the better players as they even looking for higher moves. Ie BEK.yeh fair point, invite was the wrong word, i meant if you offer no attacking threat you encourage sides to be more ambitious. I do expect us to try and retain posession rather than low block and hoof it away... just not sure how we do much with that possession. In the periods of time we don't have the ball i can see us getting hemmed in with no outlet. I guess it's why the no 9 who can hold the ball up and run the channels is critical.
Guess we all want that flashy winger, the slick 10 and the goal-scoring all round 9 we've been hankering after and not delivered on!
So basically after one game, Sunderland are gonna be mid table and Burnley are relegated. Based on that we’ll know our fate after tomorrow. ‘‘Twas a short season that



It’s because we’re selling players we no longer want whereas the clubs you mentioned are selling their best players for profit (they’d rather keep but can’t as the player wants a step up), that’s the difference.We are really poor at selling players. We paid £5 million for Meslier and he has nearly 200 appearances for us, 3 seasons in the PL, keeper of the season in the Championship 2 years ago and we will make a small loss on him. If he played for Brighton, Liverpool, Ipswich or Chelsea he'd be going for £35 million.
Maybe Betis will take him on loan if we pay them a couple of million.
If we get a couple of wingers in, then we have to send Ramazani on loan because we wont recoup the £10 million we spent on him.
We had to loan Wober because we couldn't get a measly £3 million for him.
It’s because we’re selling players we no longer want whereas the clubs you mentioned are selling their best players for profit (they’d rather keep but can’t as the player wants a step up), that’s the difference.
Agree with that regarding timing because ultimately, despite Meslier’s PL experience, we are now selling our 3rd choice goalkeeper and that doesn’t bring in big fees. No idea why he was kept but guessing that the coaches thought he would develop further with the experience he was getting.The difference is the timing. We should have sold Meslier after the 2nd season in the PL. We could all see he wasn't strong enough for relegation battles but he had a really strong reputation from helping us up, helping us finish 9th and helping us stave off relegation.
Same with Bamford. He had his season in the PL and there was interest in him. That was the time to get rid. It was clear to most fans that Paddy was more miss than hit.
We agreed £25 million for Jack Harrison but instead gave him a new contract on big wages with loan clauses. Without the new contract we could have sold him on the summer after relegation.
Its not about whether we want the players or not, it's about the timing of the business. Look at Brighton, they know when to sell for the highest price.