Part of the problem with this debate is the fact that that mental conditions are held against the people who have them in a bizarre way whereas physical conditions are not.
If I was to say that a poster wrote like he had a broken arm, this wouldn't be considered to be much of an attack on the poster, nor an attack on people with broken arms. It would just be odd. I suppose the problem with conditions like autism, aspergers etc is that it might genuinely be possible to diagnose them given enough written content, but it still shouldn't be considered insulting to say that someone appears to be autistic. We all have some degree of autism and its not a bad thing to be autistic.
I tend to agree. It wasn't even an issue until Saints/HIAG decided to try and score cheap points with it. Saints jumped on Ginger's comment, then HIAG joined in. They both then started giving it the faux moral outrage, until I pointed out that HIAG had made similar comments and exposed their hypocrisy.
It should never really have been an issue in the first place.
priceless ... meltdown extraordinaire
... if you allude to "kid on the bus" I assume you are not meaning a young goat (that's why "they have to be children")... although in your world who knows for sure?

