Thanks for the info Dufus it sort of franks 47% of Americans and 98% of the world.
LoWhat was that supposed to say?
LOL .... that's going to hurt me for awhile ...LOLI have. Your post is still gibberish. What does Frank have to do with it?
Yeah one on each of your shoulders.On the contrary, I have given the most intellectual responses on this thread and I have been hampered and impeded by ****s, twats and ****wits.
You spent pages arguing that he was using a semi automatic which you said he could fire a max of 45-60 rounds per minute, when the footage already had the rate of fire at 90 rounds in 10 seconds. You then tried saying that the rapid fire was the SWAT team, when they'd not even ****ing arrived
You've since moved on to suggesting it was a Govt plot.......in short you've chatted absolute ****e about this from the off.
Too late you spastic gimp, you were torn to pieces over it yesterday and now trying to backtrack on the lies you told you cretin.No, I didn't. I said from the very start that I hadn't heard the main footage. Now we hear that things are not quite what they seem, and yet the 'Pede plough in with its usual ****.
You've all ****ed up, and I am going to vilify you for it. You know that.

If as we suspect he did shoot himself at close range with a pistol he would definitely have brain tissue on his firing hand from the back spray, clean hands means he never shot himself. That of course would open up the theory that the police executed him or there was an accomplice.I don't know. I'm not a conspiracy theorist so I don't want to get into that. I'm just saying everything about that picture is unnatural
I hate conspiracy theorists and shout them down constantly.
Somebody has just sent me a picture of the shooters body that was found in the hotel room. Anybody who knows anything about forensics will know that it hasn't got the look of a suicide job.
The police would've said if they'd killed him. They'd have no reason not to.If as we suspect he did shoot himself at close range with a pistol he would definitely have brain tissue on his firing hand from the back spray, clean hands means he never shot himself. That of course would open up the theory that the police executed him or there was an accomplice.
The police would've said if they'd killed him. They'd have no reason not to.
A lot of them were wearing body cams too, so we'll probably see the footage of their entry eventually.
In the same way they showed their cam shots of Bin Laden's body being dumped in the sea, you mean? The
Seeing as they didn't, no.In the same way they showed their cam shots of Bin Laden's body being dumped in the sea, you mean? The
Seeing as they didn't, no.
****ing Bell's on a roll tonight.In the same way they showed their cam shots of Bin Laden's body being dumped in the sea, you mean? The

That's what they want you to think.I see that HIAG is still making a **** of himself on this thread. No surprises there to be honest.
Anyway, looking at that pic of Paddock I don't see how anybody could really discern that he was shot by police. He's clearly been shot through the roof of his mouth, which would suggest that he did it himself. Otherwise, why would a heavily armed man just stand there and allow a police officer to come up to him and put a gun in his mouth ?
Also, if the Police had shot him, it's likely that he would have received several shots to the body and head from marksmen at the door to the hotel room. That picture has all the hallmarks of a self inflicted gunshot wound.
That's what they want you to think.![]()
The endless conspiracy loop : It only looks that way because they want it to look that way, even though it is that way.That's the problem with conspiracy theory thinking. If all evidence is unreliable, then how do you come to any conclusions?The endless conspiracy loop : It only looks that way because they want it to look that way, even though it is that way.
That's the problem with conspiracy theory thinking. If all evidence is unreliable, then how do you come to any conclusions?
Exactly. Start with your conclusions and work backwards, disregarding any evidence that doesn't fit them.Make them up ?