Vegas shooting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
You spent pages arguing that he was using a semi automatic which you said he could fire a max of 45-60 rounds per minute, when the footage already had the rate of fire at 90 rounds in 10 seconds. You then tried saying that the rapid fire was the SWAT team, when they'd not even ****ing arrived <laugh>

You've since moved on to suggesting it was a Govt plot.......in short you've chatted absolute ****e about this from the off.

No, I didn't. I said from the very start that I hadn't heard the main footage. Now we hear that things are not quite what they seem, and yet the 'Pede plough in with its usual ****.

You've all ****ed up, and I am going to vilify you for it. You know that.
 
No, I didn't. I said from the very start that I hadn't heard the main footage. Now we hear that things are not quite what they seem, and yet the 'Pede plough in with its usual ****.

You've all ****ed up, and I am going to vilify you for it. You know that.
Too late you spastic gimp, you were torn to pieces over it yesterday and now trying to backtrack on the lies you told you cretin. <doh>
 
I don't know. I'm not a conspiracy theorist so I don't want to get into that. I'm just saying everything about that picture is unnatural
If as we suspect he did shoot himself at close range with a pistol he would definitely have brain tissue on his firing hand from the back spray, clean hands means he never shot himself. That of course would open up the theory that the police executed him or there was an accomplice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted
I hate conspiracy theorists and shout them down constantly.

Somebody has just sent me a picture of the shooters body that was found in the hotel room. Anybody who knows anything about forensics will know that it hasn't got the look of a suicide job.

Post it

Edit: you already done it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted
If as we suspect he did shoot himself at close range with a pistol he would definitely have brain tissue on his firing hand from the back spray, clean hands means he never shot himself. That of course would open up the theory that the police executed him or there was an accomplice.
The police would've said if they'd killed him. They'd have no reason not to.
A lot of them were wearing body cams too, so we'll probably see the footage of their entry eventually.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
The police would've said if they'd killed him. They'd have no reason not to.
A lot of them were wearing body cams too, so we'll probably see the footage of their entry eventually.

In the same way they showed their cam shots of Bin Laden's body being dumped in the sea, you mean? The
 
I see that HIAG is still making a **** of himself on this thread. No surprises there to be honest.

Anyway, looking at that pic of Paddock I don't see how anybody could really discern that he was shot by police. He's clearly been shot through the roof of his mouth, which would suggest that he did it himself. Otherwise, why would a heavily armed man just stand there and allow a police officer to come up to him and put a gun in his mouth ?

Also, if the Police had shot him, it's likely that he would have received several shots to the body and head from marksmen at the door to the hotel room. That picture has all the hallmarks of a self inflicted gunshot wound.
 
In the same way they showed their cam shots of Bin Laden's body being dumped in the sea, you mean? The

The military wouldn't have been required to have body cams when they took out Bin Laden.

Edit : PNP has already put you straight on this <ok>
 
I see that HIAG is still making a **** of himself on this thread. No surprises there to be honest.

Anyway, looking at that pic of Paddock I don't see how anybody could really discern that he was shot by police. He's clearly been shot through the roof of his mouth, which would suggest that he did it himself. Otherwise, why would a heavily armed man just stand there and allow a police officer to come up to him and put a gun in his mouth ?

Also, if the Police had shot him, it's likely that he would have received several shots to the body and head from marksmen at the door to the hotel room. That picture has all the hallmarks of a self inflicted gunshot wound.
That's what they want you to think. :bandit:
 
<laugh> The endless conspiracy loop : It only looks that way because they want it to look that way, even though it is that way.
That's the problem with conspiracy theory thinking. If all evidence is unreliable, then how do you come to any conclusions?
 
Make them up ?
Exactly. Start with your conclusions and work backwards, disregarding any evidence that doesn't fit them.
Evidence matches your conclusion? It's legit. Evidence contradicts your conclusion? Fake news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Also as PNP has already said, if the Police had shot him, they would have just said that they shot him. There's no issue here to cover up or hide, they were out to nullify an active shooter who'd already killed dozens of people, there's simply no reason for them to say that he killed himself if they had shot him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock