v Norwich

[Cravingawin]

I think the Norwich paper ratings are a little miserly, which reflects the parochial concerns of a local paper (although their summary of how everyone played is pretty accurate). On the 'who scored' ratings, 8 of our starting eleven got 7.6 or higher, which I think is a better reflection of the game. I hadn't seen whoscored.com before this, but it looks like a site worth revisiting.

Cheers Captain. I'll take a look. I think that 4 or 5 players should have got 8.

 

[Cottager58]

I think the Norwich paper ratings are a little miserly, which reflects the parochial concerns of a local paper (although their summary of how everyone played is pretty accurate). On the 'who scored' ratings, 8 of our starting eleven got 7.6 or higher, which I think is a better reflection of the game. I hadn't seen whoscored.com before this, but it looks like a site worth revisiting.

As you say about the local paper Captain. The whoscored.com is definitely interesting.

The accuracy of our passing in midfield stands out, as does shots on target - Petric's stats are amazing. If I've got a criticism it's the weightings they apply to get the final rating. For example, good though he was I don't think any of us had Duff as MOTM and they don't seem take assists/creating chances into account - Diarra had 3 to Dembele's 0.

As stats go however, jolly good indicator.

 

[Cottager58]

Just noticed that the Club have a detailed breakdown of the game on the new website (under the 'Match Centre' page) -

http://www.fulhamfc.com/match-centre/2012_2013/league/home/norwich-city

 

[silkship]

This is excellent.

Even more encouraging - just over 40% of total attempted passes were completed passes in the attacking half of the pitch.

Amazingly, between them for the whole game, Dembele and Diarra managed 2 tackles- but were involved in plenty of 'duel's, Ruiz made 2 and had 5 duels

Haangeland made no tackles, but won 3 aerial duels.