Utter Fergie

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
The historical persecution of black people for the supposed crime of being black seems to have completely passed you by KPR. You too Dong.

Can we be clear what this is supposed to mean NOF? Are you saying equal opportunities legislation and anti-discrimination legislation should not be applied equally and should discriminate in favour of some races? Is it an exercise in redressing history?

That isn't what the law, at least, says. It isn't, on paper at any rate, what the FA's own legislation states, but nonetheless you may be right in that it is the way the FA itself, and various single-race pressure groups interpret it. But if it covertly is an exercise in redressing historic injustices could i state my claim now that as a quarter Chinese I am associated with a race that has been persecuted longer than African negroes. As part Saxon I must surely have a claim against Scandinavians for their Viking attrocities and persecution that lasted over two hundred years during the Middle-Ages. And don't go there about how my celtic forebears were persecuted by Romans and Saxons.

So what do i get? Nothing? Is it because I isn't black? How racist is THAT!?
 
Whats with the insults...? I think some people may have been on the juice <doh>

Who cares what substances they may or may not have partaken of? It merely illustrates the weakness of the argument and the lack of the ability for self-analysis.
 
I think some people may have been on the juice

Maybe Dave is just pissed off with the endless threads on other clubs, it just drags in arguments and wums.

If (for example) Fergie talks crap I'd have the bollox to post a thread on the Utd board.
 
Maybe Dave is just pissed off with the endless threads on other clubs, it just drags in arguments and wums.

If (for example) Fergie talks crap I'd have the bollox to post a thread on the Utd board.

It seems to be the same suspects on your board so upto you guys to speak to the mods about it.

I know on the United board, we have too many threads about Liverpool so now Swarbs has said he will merge them and only the ones directly linked to United allowed in a separate thread.
 
Yes Luv, its bad enough when UIR & NOF et al infect every LFC topic without encouraging them with united topics in here so tes do it in the UIR thread or on their board (except you cant it'd get banned)but its a bit cheeky to be fair that they get to come on here spout their ****e then abuse personally a LFC fan for retaliating. Fair enough if we invade their board: duck season open (I don't in general & deserved the abuse when did) so: I never asked this before but for sake of all decent posters & I mean some of the Mancs like Eric & Swarbs (yes they like a wind up; so do we but when some of these scum ****ers come on our board name calling ban the ****ers . They deliberately attempt to descend into this ****e & yes some of our lot (you know who you are: encourage it. So I changed my mind; don't ban just, please mods, start deleting off topic, he said she said bollox(that should get rid of most of UIR & NOF's post anyway) but by all means do the same against us for being stupid enough to do it. And I'm not talking WUM hunting, just the same old guys with nothing new to say but deliberately turn it to two subjects then name calling. And by all means delete mine too because I've been guilty of it!

Just not this rant ok? :D
 
I can clearly state that my comments last night were meant to be sarcastic. Sadly they achieved their objective by provoking such stereotypical responses.
 
Foredeckdave:3707966 said:
Whats with the insults...? I think some people may have been on the juice <doh>

Who cares what substances they may or may not have partaken of? It merely illustrates the weakness of the argument and the lack of the ability for self-analysis.

...<ok>

littleDinosaurLuke:3708097 said:
If every ref decided every decision in your favour, you'd still be nowhere.

But conspiracy theories do keep you warm at night.

Get back to the spuds board <ok>
 
I don't even need to tell you why I'm closing this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.