Bozz..Do you think he said "Shut up Mikey" or "Shut up Monkey"?On the balance of probabilities (eg... one mans word against anothers...) .... Yes
I don't even know why fergie was asked the question. this is between Chelsea, Clattenberg & the FA - it's not as though they asked Martin O'Neil or Andre Villas Boas... why does he have to stick his red nose in to everything?
On the balance of probabilities (eg... one mans word against anothers...) .... Yes
25yrs ago has no relevance to the incident in question or his playing career so?
The media want the views of a high profile manager to spin the story out a bit more, and there are none more high profile.
As for sticking his nose in, are you really surprised? One of the most skilled users of the media in football history, and you can't believe he publicly backed the referee over one of his biggest rivals for the title this year? Shock horror!
You mean on the balance of two Chelsea players, neither of whom were being spoken to by the ref, and who it now appears may have misheard his accent, versus the views of the ref, all three assistants, and both players who were apparently the target of the insults and yet heard nothing. Smacks of Kuyt telling the ref what Evra apparently said to his face....
Wenger has given his thoughts on the incident as well so you conveniently ignore that just so you can have another dig at Fergie
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ver-mark-clattenburg-allegations-8274618.html
Finally, as he runs the FA, the Premier League and the United Nations it will ultimately be fergie who decides on the guilt or innocence of Clattenburg so Suarez can expect to be punished severely.

As you said, he was asked the question so it's not quite the same as sticking his red nose into the issue.
Wenger has given his thoughts on the incident as well so you conveniently ignore that just so you can have another dig at Fergie
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...ver-mark-clattenburg-allegations-8274618.html
A man, a manager of a football club who abuses and rants kicks things and throws complete fits cannot believe clutterbug is lying and that he abused Mikel, he certainly did Torres
Fergie believed Evra funnily enough. But cos it aint one of his players suspected of racism it can be brushed aside because Fergie thinks it aint true, which i s one of the biggest problems facing people suffering it, being believed and trying to prove it
And here we have a prominent figure coming out and saying.. Ahh its unthinkable said Fergie, how can you get a fair hearnig when thats the opinion of Fergie and probably the FA, without any facts whatsoever, with one hand he pretends to back anti racism and with the other shows us one of the problems getting justice for it![]()
Fergie
Of course he is going to come out and back his lackey.


[h=1]Arsene Wenger criticises Chelsea for going public over Mark Clattenburg allegations[/h]
[h=3]Arsenal manager says London rivals have 'little proof' that referee abused Mikel during Sunday's match
​Seem to remember another case where there was no evidence except a players word that the incident happened.
[/h]

He was wired up to his assistants and fourth official.
Obviously.
Of course it has, football has changed massively in the last 25 years. As you know all too well, it's not that hard to grasp is it?
Football has changed hugely, for the worse, in the last five years let alone twenty five.
I don't even know why fergie was asked the question. this is between Chelsea, Clattenberg & the FA - it's not as though they asked Martin O'Neil or Andre Villas Boas... why does he have to stick his red nose in to everything?

Because journalists know Fergie can't resist have his two pennies worth...?![]()
Because journalists know that when Fergie speaks people listen. Some may not like what he has to say, regardless of what it is he says, but almost everyone has an opinion. Would BBF have put his drink down long enough to start this thread if Wenger had commented on the incident?Because journalists know Fergie can't resist have his two pennies worth...?![]()
Answer this honestly, do you think Clattenburg racially abused the Chelsea players?
So you seriously think it's worse now than it was for Batson, Barnes, Cunningham, Regis etc, come on Ruff players,refs and supporters used to get away with blatant racism sad to say.
Modern day black footballers have a voice in the game, back then the lads had to swallow it and keep shtum.
No, it's because those two managers were not involved in the game in question.

Because journalists know that when Fergie speaks people listen. Some may not like what he has to say, regardless of what it is he says, but almost everyone has an opinion. Would BBF have put his drink down long enough to start this thread if Wenger had commented on the incident?
Funnily enough Wenger did comment on the incident but BBF wasn't interested in what he had to say!


I think the difference between the Suarez and Clattenburg cases is that Suarez admitted to using a racist slur