Match Day Thread Us vs Wolves

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Geordieginola said:
I’m not “moaning” I’m stating facts.

I have stated a positive. We played better.

I also didn’t blame Bruce for the missed opportunities.

But you need a reality check mate. We played Watford. We didn’t win and we had 50% possession and not many more chances so if day it was an even game.

And you have said they where poor. Yet we didn’t win. We didn’t have more possession and we had 2 more shots on target.
Click to expand...

We drew a game that's a point in he bag... It doesn't matter of its Watford.. They beat villa for example and nufc were predicted by many to lose this game.

You're moaning and being overly critical and blaming bruce win lose or draw.

You don't even realise you're doing it

If we'd won you'd say it was lucky just like this time last season...

Everyone just hates bruce
 
  • Like
Reactions: Welshie
So basically 433 has always been the way to go and Bruce’s stubborn ignorance has once again cost us points and made it all far harder than it should have been?

As ive said for the best part of the season, 4 at the back (with no Lascelles) with three in the middle and an attacking trio works, because you simply have 5 defending and 5 attacking, thus balance.

When all fit, bring Wilson back in and put Joe or Miggy on the bench. Probably do with Dummett in LB? And Dubs in goal.

Almiron was RW? Maybe keep him there and ASM left. But at least it’s options and it’s probably not a relegation side.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geordie Ginola
Roland Deschain said:
So basically 433 has always been the way to go and Bruce’s stubborn ignorance has once again cost us points and made it all far harder than it should have been?

As ive said for the best part of the season, 4 at the back (with no Lascelles) with three in the middle and an attacking trio works, because you simply have 5 defending and 5 attacking, thus balance.

When all fit, bring Wilson back in and put Joe or Miggy on the bench. Probably do with Dummett in LB? And Dubs in goal.

Almiron was RW? Maybe keep him there and ASM left. But at least it’s options and it’s probably not a relegation side.
Click to expand...

Why does everyone always want to drop Almiron. He's literally our best player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie290761 and Welshie
Roy Munson said:
We drew a game that's a point in he bag... It doesn't matter of its Watford.. They beat villa for example and nufc were predicted by many to lose this game.

You're moaning and being overly critical and blaming bruce win lose or draw.

You don't even realise you're doing it

If we'd won you'd say it was lucky just like this time last season...

Everyone just hates bruce
Click to expand...
I’m just going to lol at you now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Flash
Roland Deschain said:
So basically 433 has always been the way to go and Bruce’s stubborn ignorance has once again cost us points and made it all far harder than it should have been?

As ive said for the best part of the season, 4 at the back (with no Lascelles) with three in the middle and an attacking trio works, because you simply have 5 defending and 5 attacking, thus balance.

When all fit, bring Wilson back in and put Joe or Miggy on the bench. Probably do with Dummett in LB? And Dubs in goal.

Almiron was RW? Maybe keep him there and ASM left. But at least it’s options and it’s probably not a relegation side.
Click to expand...


5 at the back kept us up and over 17 games we were the 10th best side, so I would make a case that sticking with it for 5 games wasn't such a bad call. There is going to be times when things don't work, so a few games makes sense.

He's changed it and it works, so that's good isn't it.

Reason for being optimistic that Bruce's change can be as effective as when we changed in December last year.

Almiron was excellent yesterday and Joelinton was good no way I'd drop either.

When Wilson's fit go 4 2 3 1 like we've all said for 2 years imo
 
Roy Munson said:
5 at the back kept us up and over 17 games we were the 10th best side, so I would make a case that sticking with it for 5 games wasn't such a bad call. There is going to be times when things don't work, so a few games makes sense.

He's changed it and it works, so that's good isn't it.

Reason for being optimistic that Bruce's change can be as effective as when we changed in December last year.

Almiron was excellent yesterday and Joelinton was good no way I'd drop either.

When Wilson's fit go 4 2 3 1 like we've all said for 2 years imo
Click to expand...

Got no issue with your last sentence, we’ve all said it for two years or more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson.
Geordieginola said:
Overly negative. Won 7 in the last 36 games mate.

LOL
Click to expand...


I was told by the same people last season they judge a full season when newcastle were doing well for the second half of the season.. Which is it?

He finished 13th 12th over full seasons

We're 6 games in and 17th and here are the same faces on their witch hunt pulling out irrelevant stats to justify their endless pursuit.

No matter what happens you'll keep changing the rules and your point of attack.

You're like a weeble
 
Roy Munson said:
I was told by the same people last season they judge a full season when newcastle were doing well for the second half of the season.. Which is it?

He finished 13th 12th over full seasons

We're 6 games in and 17th and here are the same faces on their witch hunt pulling out irrelevant stats to justify their endless pursuit.

No matter what happens you'll keep changing the rules and your point of attack.

You're like a weeble
Click to expand...
LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson.
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back