US Election

[Peej]

Yeah, he heard it on CNN.

Good ol' Mr Mainstream has his finger on the pulse of American through watching the Democratic owned media.

Three cheers for Mr Mainstream and his expert knowledge.

Hip! Hip!

I’m with you. If it’s not Fox and Friends or YouTube then it’s bollocks.

 

[O'l Gravy Leg.]

Yeah but Trump claims he beats China every time, so I don't see the problem

You must log in or register to see images

Beats them till they put money into his secret Chinese bank account

 

[Tobes]

You are so thick that you will literally believe any **** you read.

Go to his website and see what he has to say about that subject. It's bollocks, invented by the powerful people who he reports on and exposes.

From now on, I am going to call you Mr Mainstream.

He’s literally had his YouTube videos removed for holocaust denial ffs, as well as being de platformed and banned by the likes of Google Adsense and PayPal.

But yeah his own website.

You gullible ****ing plum

 

[Diego]

Diego, you have to imagine each state as a different country, a bit like the EU, but each state/country has its own rules....unless the EU Federal state decides otherwise.

So legally you can or you can't? Not really explaining much is it

 

[Tobes]

That's some assertion mate, can you post some proof?

Not how it works, hence the word unsubstantiated, have another go.

 

[Peej]

Seriously the way the US system is now, what stops China buying a bunch of people off to influence an election in a system that is so open to fraud? There is nothing to stop them doing that
So then the integrity of an election depends on the integrity of relatively low paid officials at polling stations?

that's mental

To do something like that, you would need a way to pay them, say having a bank account in China......

 

[Treble]

What he described, was much what i would have expected to happen my postal ballot vote that I make in the UK. Like I say the only downside, is nothing fraudulent can be matched back afterwards, but they should still have all the detached ids, to cover that side of things.

I'd agree with that. But in my mind, having looked at the process, I'm thinking on what basis would you claim fraud after the process. So I'm thinking it through. If someone says, hey the vote in Georgia is a fraud, they would need to give a just cause. Then the next question would be, ok so why didn't you challenge it at the time when you witnessed it?

If they challenged it at the time, it would be dealt with at the time. And if you didn't at the time, why not?

I'm not knocking the idea of calling out a voter fraud, just thinking through on what grounds you could do it after the event rather than during it.

 

[DerekTheMole]

That's some assertion mate, can you post some proof?

You must log in or register to see images

 

[brb]

So legally you can or you can't? Not really explaining much is it

You can legally do what you want, until Federal law overules you

 

[Peej]

You must log in or register to see images

Hitchens is a ****, but he is right.

 

[O'l Gravy Leg.]

To do something like that, you would need a way to pay them, say having a bank account in China......

a secret bank account?

 

[brb]

I'd agree with that. But in my mind, having looked at the process, I'm thinking on what basis would you claim fraud after the process. So I'm thinking it through. If someone says, hey the vote in Georgia is a fraud they'd need to give a just cause. Then the next question would be, ok so why didn't you challenge it at the time that you witnessed it.

If they challenged it at the time, it would be dealt with at the time. And if you didn't at the time, why not?

I'm not knocking the idea of calling out a voter fraud, just thinking through on what grounds you could do it after the event rather than during it.

You really need to prove fraud during the process, rather than after it. But it's no different to voting in person if you think about it, you are checked at initial process, ie walking in the door or an envelope being opened, but after that process, the vote should never be traceable back to you, as per a democratic process.

 

[Tobes]

The "on the day" votes

Do you think they are counted at the polling stations

No. Do you think it’s not possible that they’re moved to counting centres in boxes at times during the day like?

This level of desperation is beautiful to watch.

Keep going

 

[Peej]

a secret bank account?

Nah, nobody would be ducking stupid enough to have a bank account in China. Especially if you blame China for all the problems.

 

[Diego]

Not how it works, hence the word unsubstantiated, have another go.

Can you substantiate it's wrong?

Or are you just giving an opinion

 

[O'l Gravy Leg.]

That's some assertion mate, can you post some proof?

You have to remember, he doesn't have "knowledge"
You know how it goes.

**** having an avid interest, or knowing stuff, just google it for 5 minutes and run with that

 

[Diego]

You must log in or register to see images

I knew that

 

[Peej]

Can you substantiate it's wrong?

Or are you just giving an opinion

In my opinion, I’m undecided.

 

[Hoddle is a god]

He’s literally had his YouTube videos removed for holocaust denial ffs, as well as being de platformed and banned by the likes of Google Adsense and PayPal.

But yeah his own website.

You gullible ****ing plum

You complete dunder head!

He's been attacked by powerful Zionist lobbies because of his scathing and erudite attacks on Zionism and Israeli influence in US foreign policy.

You literally are the kind of closed minded idiot that I cannot communicate with. Your ignorance and stupidity prevent you from engaging in anything other than the most superficial of topics. You have a scratch-and-sniff understanding of politics that truly sickens me.

 

[brb]

You really need to prove fraud during the process, rather than after it. But it's no different to voting in person if you think about it, you are checked at initial process, ie walking in the door or an envelope being opened, but after that process, the vote should never be traceable back to you, as per a democratic process.

@Treble although to balance what I just said, one of the Republican claims is that an observer did challenge the process, but was evicted from the counting room.