Yeah but the state votes are split into counties don’t forget. Whether he concedes or not is irrelevant, once one of them gets to 270 it’s done, and unless it’s incredibly close the outcome will be clear by early morning mate.This year it's a ridiculously higher amount on the postal vote than 2016.
That's true about the swing States but not enough for Trump to concede imo.
It depends how many have counted their postal votes. Lets say the postal votes are in and counted for Florida and he loses this, BUT if the other States haven't counted their postal votes then on the night, the remaining "in person" votes won't show a massive majority for anyone. Will anyone concede in that scenario? I don't think so.
They were saying on the news before that the college vote is right up this time compared to hilary/trump and that's another big plus for Biden. I don't know what that means apart from it sounds good![]()

I eventually got that. That's ****edWhat I've learnt (I'm sure others probably know this) that Americans are actually voting for "electors". So if a State is worth 49 then that is 49 actual people. And as we know in other States they're worth different amounts. All of these are actual people. Hence why it's the Electoral College. After the election is over all these folk get together for a meeting and officially hand over all their votes for either Biden or Trump.
The best bit is none of them are compelled to honour the vote.![]()

I eventually got that. That's ****ed
Has any college went against their vote before?

Very rarely but it's happened and they're given a name when they do it, I just can't remember it![]()
So them 49 votes for a state, would they be like councillors from each town within that state? Sorry for the questions. Newbie hereVery rarely but it's happened and they're given a name when they do it, I just can't remember it![]()
So them 49 votes for a state, would they be like councillors from each town within that state? Sorry for the questions. Newbie here![]()

I think either side would be mad to go against the will of the people with the passion and tension over there, at the momentYeh their's are districts. Newbie too so I've looked it up again...
People call them “faithless electors.” In 2016, seven electors — 5 Democrats and 2 Republicans — broke their promises to vote for their party’s nominee, the most ever in history. They voted for a variety of candidates not on the ballot: Bernie Sanders, Colin Powell and Ron Paul, among others. It did not change the outcome tbf.
I've also read 33 States have them pledged to vote for the winning candidate so that's fcked that... but 17 States could still rebel![]()

The will of the people is democracy mate but the Yanks leave to the few.I think either side would be mad to go against the will of the people with the passion and tension over there, at the moment![]()
Get ready for more of this kinda **** as the night wears on
You must log in or register to see media
