It's all CGI. In fact Trump is a CGI character anyway, you can tell by how false he looks and how utterly ridiculous everything he says is. And no-one on here has ever seen him in real life. He's a character based on some dystopian post-apocalyptic future megalomaniac. Like Dennis Hopper in Waterworld or something.
A shout out for William on this score - there's obviously baldness in that family, but he seems to be embracing it without any need for comb-overs and suchlike. Can't stand blokes who do that.
Btw, has anyone else noticed that Sisu stopped posting on here around the same time Trump started his bid for the presidency? Just making the observation....
Putin told him to stop focusing on propeganda to mainly British people. He needed all hands on deck to get his puppet installed in the US. More seriously. Not to be a conspiracy theorist.. but I still am half convinced Sisu is one of those Russian plants that are paid by Moscow to troll Western forums putting Russia in a positive light. Not 606 was simply not enough eyes to be worth bothering about anymore.
Yeah... I edited my post during the time you were replying to flesh out that it wouldn't surprise me if there were. Obviously there is a chance he legitimately was a nut. Or was influenced by propaganda whilst not being a propagandist himself. There's also the chance he was a sock account of another account and someone having a laugh at all of us falling for it.
I always got the impression he was genuine. He pm'd me many a time, mostly over that No 7 building in the Twin Towers/9/11 thing. He just copied and pasted every fake news cranksite he could get his hands on. I think, like one of my dearest, bestest friends from 6th form many decades ago, he just wanted to believe EVERYTHING that opposed the 'official' line. I think psychologists would say he had father/authority issues. My mate grew out of his in his 30's (after a brief relapse in believing every episode of the X Files was based on the 'TRUTH'! - his emphasis), but Sis just seems incapable of disbeleiving anything that postures itself as 'Anti-establishment'. There's a link there with the dogshit that pervades the net and social media nowadays. He often irritated, sometimes amused, but I only really took offence over two things: the moon-landings (because I'm a dripping wet bore on the subject), but, more importantly, the Sandy Hook 'False Flag' idiocy. The latter is just not ****ing funny; those parents are still being baited by cyber-cranks nowadays.
I was reading an article on that this weekend. I had no clue just how bad that had got. People pulling up gravestones and memorials because "the victims never existed". A large number of parents had to move to escape harassment and they've all received multiple death threats.
Sometimes there is just a big ****ing black line that separates truth and lies, with no grey areas nor 'Alternative facts'. Completely despicable, and the game of 'Aren't I cool, as I'm not a sheeple like you' (ironically played mostly by ovine virgins gulibly swallowing anything that builds their feeble self-esteem) steps right over that line in this case.
That sandy hook stuff sounds too far fetched even as a conspiracy. It is stupid how some people will try to look for anything anti government and see wrong in everything. I know people who believe 9/11 to be an inside job, government are controlling us with chlorine in the water etc. At the same time I'm not naive enough to believe everything coming out from our media. I happen to think the actions of russia is more from western expansion. Not saying what they did in crimea is correct but i have no doubt that the usa or us would react in the same way. I welcome what they are doing in syria and isis. Likewise i know theres conspiracies on certain cannibis plants being anti cancer but that pharma companies do not want it to be legalised or known as they cant charge thousands of pounds for their drugs. Theres no real science but i dont doubt theres an element of truth in it. Likewise you have your alternative facts on murdoch controlling most things we do. I havent really given that much thought and am more inclined to believe something more akin to the brandenburg group. I dont think you are nutty though as i can see why you could believe such a thing and am aware of how his media slants many stories.
Oh no doubt. I'm sure it spoons the Russians to have former enemies expanding their influence over nations they formerly occupied. The buffer zone is gone, NATO is right on their doorstep. Understand ably they're pissed off and want to grab any piece of territory they can. Ukraine makes a nice.buffer zone, from their perspective makes sense to try and reclaim it. Despite understanding Russia's motives there I still think.Putin is undeniably in the wrong.
I agree with all of that. With the Twin Towers, the fact that he would give credence to several theories that disputed the official line - even if they contradicted each other- showed that it was an anti-authoritarian stance more than a genuine belief. I know a few people who swallow the "Moon Landings Were Fake" tripe. If you're old enough to have seen it live, the years of build-up to it, and all the subsequent evidence, you'd know that it would have to be the most outrageously elaborate hoax ever conceived. I don't think Sis was a bad guy, I honestly think he was concerned about the way the world is run and how unjust and exploitative it all is. Aren't we all, though? We should all keep open minds and question what we're told, but uncritical acceptance of any alternative to the official line is just as gullible. And when it comes down to harassment of the bereaved based on little more than an anti-establishment fantasy, then that really is going too far.
Killing peado's is a great step forward imo but needs to be a little complicated than that. Someone can be labeled a peado after sleeping with someone a day younger than them! Also need to consider the 14-15 year olds that look older and go looking for it.
No they would be named an ephebophile. *****phile is someone that goes after prepubescents. Ephebophile goes after teenagers. Still bad, but arguably not AS bad. I don't know the rules in the UK but most States over here you can't be charged with sleeping with a minor if she is just a day younger , there has to be a two year age gap. Does UK not have similar rule? I also wouldn't agree with killing them. Lengthy sentences, mandatory psychiatric treatment and sign off before being released. Castration for repeat offenders.
Hold on....did I miss a whole chunk of convo lol...not disagreeing but on my page this is a sharp right turn in the convo lol
He was definitely a genuine crank. Like you say he lapped up anything that was anti establishment, as he loved a conspiracy theory. The fact that he was obviously completely paranoid was of course nothing to do with his copious ingestion of green...... He used to make me laugh, as he'd post some cut and paste straight from a crank site or an oil shill sponsored climate change denier site, and then go apeshit if you challenged the logic behind the claims posted, and call everyone who did so a google expert. It was laughable in it's idiocy.
