I simply will not be persuaded that our club didn't open with a commercially appropriate (albeit cosmetically unattractive and actually unacceptable) bid. To do so would be counter-productive and jars strongly with all the professionalism that our club has showed since the threat of administration. So I'm going to frame my judgement of these rumours on that basis.
Name one other bid where we have mucked the other club around recently? Generally speaking, I think we've negotiated sensibly and there has been commercial wisdom - I would say we've erred on the side of paying generously for the likes of Howson, Snodgrass, Pilks, Bennetts, Andreu, Miquel and even in relation to Neil himself. The only transfer where we behaved a bit oddly was with RvW, but that was because we stole a march by paying cash early, up front to a club in dire need (and ended up with a dud anyway...)
If you behave like twats in negotiations, you tend to fall short. I sincerely doubt we are behaving as badly as Bruce is so keen to paint because we haven't done it before and it doesn't fit in with our ethos over the last five years. I also think there is more to the bids than meets the eye - I will repeat again that Hull allegedly still owe us a large chunk of the Snodgrass fee and that there was a rumour it formed part of the Brady bid consideration.