Yes and no mate. The domestic rules can be bent in theory by over inflated commercial deals from related sponsors, but the reality appears to be that clubs are seeking to adhere to it.
Utd and city no... the sensible ones yes.
Yes and no mate. The domestic rules can be bent in theory by over inflated commercial deals from related sponsors, but the reality appears to be that clubs are seeking to adhere to it.
Tobes the payments on that stadium are not going to be small and with respect theres multiuse and theres multiuse. You wont be running many major concerts just summer time... then conferences and **** like that aint going to pay the bill..
60k stadium.. how much? 300/400mil?
If you are being run right you wont be competing with us let alone arsenal and the big boys while you do it... nor should you. You have to build the other revenues streams and reputation to attract players.
After all... theres absolutely nothing wrong with doing it sustainably. This league is mad with money so to actually build a team will require exquisite care rather than just big bucks spending.
A 60,000 stadium would cost more than that. Arsenal paid about £600m and that was ten years ago. Plus there are the community improvements to consider too.
I dunno.. no idea. Theres london prices and rest of world prices so ive no idea. We were quoted by the pie in the sky lot at 400 or so?
United will comply, City will on paperUtd and city no... the sensible ones yes.
The 50k Kirkby stadium was going to be less than £100mFair point on London vs Liverpool prices. Still can't see it only being £400m though
Fair point on London vs Liverpool prices. Still can't see it only being £400m though
The 50k Kirkby stadium was going to be less than £100m
The 50k Kirkby stadium was going to be less than £100m
Tobes the payments on that stadium are not going to be small and with respect theres multiuse and theres multiuse. You wont be running many major concerts just summer time... then conferences and **** like that aint going to pay the bill..
The annual cost will depend on the funding method and the timescale set for repayment.
He could build the stadium via a holding company and lease it back to the club over 99 years for all you know at present, so you can't make definitive statements like that mate.

It was a cheap identikit effort. 4x2 tier stands and a basic design. You can't use the Emirates as the yardstick.You manage to employ the A-Team? Make a stadium out of a few old tyres, a wooden gym bench and a bag full of cotton wool?
It was a cheap identikit effort. 4x2 tier stands and a basic design. You can't use the Emirates as the yardstick.
It'd be somewhere in the £350-400m region imo
The annual cost will depend on the funding method and the timescale set for repayment.
He could build the stadium via a holding company and lease it back to the club over 99 years for all you know at present, so you can't make definitive statements like that mate.
Why would he have to use his own cash?He could if he had a spare 500mil... you lad hasnt all that many billions you know...
Mr ambramovich has taken 10 years to start chelseas. It looks likely with them that they are looking for investemt out of china to make it happen. Perhaps even equity in club
So..... you might do the same who knows... but my opinion on any club whos going to try all that and build a team to challenge is taking on too much.
Do one or other imo. Long term everton having the stadium, revenue coming in and all the corporate **** is the good first step.
All they need is the hardest part, wise investment in players and managing the team with a low net spend. The reality is spurs have done this most years. If everton dont think thats good enough for them....... well....
Why would he have to use his own cash?
Who's said we'll spend £500m on players?Cos thatd be the only way its not a real repayment and interest.
If he borrows 500mil and gets interest to pay then gives it to you interest free he could end up playing what a bil or more back over 20 years time... so.... if abramovic isnt willing... hmmm... everton will need to pay its way in this surely?
You couldnt get a bank to look at you under bill right? Well now they will.... but you cant assume you can do that and spend another 500mil on players too.
Who's said we'll spend £500m on players?
Who said he'd leverage borrowings for the stadium build and not charge the football club for the interest?
There's a number of different funding models he could use, he's a bean counter, so I'm sure he's capable of doing the sums himself mate![]()
500mil is minimum required to compete at the top end. Look at what utd and city have spent just to knock by. If you dont spend it you wont get to cl fast.. which means you might as well do what i said...
If hes not going to just hand you the cash then you might find him selling equity to fund... if you can tell me a model where you wont have a very big interest and capital bill please do enlighten me.
£500m would see them compete at "the top end" unless you just mean challenging for top four which I wouldn't consider "top end" myself