Sounds like you'v had a row. The bigger man always makes the first move...
Have we ****

Sounds like you'v had a row. The bigger man always makes the first move...

Who was better, Cisse or Baros?
I'd be more than happy if we got Lacazette as long as we didn't turn him into Cisse who was top striker in Ligue 1 when we bought him.
And we didn't really do anything to Cisse, it was those two legs breaks (the ones where his leg bent the wrong way) that ****ed up his career.We won the CL the season we signed Cisse
We won the CL the season we signed Cisse
And we didn't really do anything to Cisse, it was those two legs breaks (the ones where his leg bent the wrong way) that ****ed up his career.
We did indeed and he scored a great penalty, now that was something he was good atWe won the CL the season we signed Cisse

I agree with MITO. Baros was the better player. Technically better, had more about him, wasn't as fast or as powerful but Baros was still pretty quick. The problem with Baros was his finishing was hit and miss (like cisse but cisse could hit it further out) and he had a proper head down syndrome. Once he got the ball expect him to dribble it a few times down the channel before getting his head up to pass. Cisse on the otherhand is the definition of no footballing IQ instead trusting his natural athletic ability. Guy loved getting caught offside. The leg break definitely finished him off though.

That's cleared that up then.if i may interject.
baros was better.. both were muck
ciise would not stay one side at all... baros was a head down player who ran into toruble all the time.
Baros did a great job for czech republic.
It seems very fitting that Rafa's first Real Madrid signing is a full back. He will probably replace Ronaldo on the wing.
Deal was done before Rafa was appointed though

Cabaye signed for palace then.
Good signing for them