I see it as a 100% no argument signing myself. I can't see any reason why we wouldn't sign him.
Because he's not good enough, and if he was, he'd have more offers from clubs who are in the CL.
I see it as a 100% no argument signing myself. I can't see any reason why we wouldn't sign him.
He's exactly what you need imo. He'll give you legs and workrate in that CM area and no little skill to boot. He's a far better player than he's being given credit for in some quarters.I see it as a 100% no argument signing myself. I can't see any reason why we wouldn't sign him.
Ahem... Not quite.If he was called Milnerinho and had won 2 league titles in Spain and you were getting him on a free, you'd be creaming your kecks.
If there is one thing Milner always does,its putting in a shift. Would be a great signingAs long as Milner is still hungry and still puts in a good shift we should pay that little extra for his services.

Because he's not good enough, and if he was, he'd have more offers from clubs who are in the CL.
He will get offers though, he's already had a big improved offer from Man City. Doesn't it tell you something when they are so desperate to keep him and they're clearly in a better position than us?
And before you point at HG requirements, they could just promote a youth player to fulfill that need. They clearly like Milner.
Fact is, we will not agree on Miners qualities. Next season, he'll be playing first team football somewhere (which is why he's leaving Man City) and hell prove his qualities one way or the other.
If he really wanted first team football, then he wouldn't have wasted 5 years on City's bench, picking up a nice 6 figure salary in the process.
Which explains why he's reportedly turned down £165k per week to stay then.........................Oh wait....If he really wanted first team football, then he wouldn't have wasted 5 years on City's bench, picking up a nice 6 figure salary in the process.

Which explains why he's reportedly turned down £165k per week to stay then.........................Oh wait....
![]()
So you're going to ignore the past 5 years of happily sitting on the bench?
And he hasn't rejected anything yet.
It would appear that you're ignoring the fact that he's made 201 total appearances for City during those 5 years...............
It would appear that you're ignoring the fact that he's made 201 total appearances for City during those 5 years...............
147 appearances in that five years (just under 30 a season average) isn't 'sitting on a bench'.
Yeah we do, he's made 201 appearances for City in 5 years mate.none of us actually know whats the score do we?
Yeah we do, he's made 201 appearances for City in 5 years mate.
I emans about his contracts and whats he doing.
none of us really know he's got an offer from city or if he's turned it down or who is in for him.
I'd actually love him to go play for arsenal now and be good and make jimmy bite his pillow in frustration.
I think Arsenal will go in for Morgan Schneiderlin. Probably because he's a better all around player.
I think Arsenal will go in for Morgan Schneiderlin. Probably because he's a better all around player.
Oh right. He could still be persuaded to stay at City, but the noises from his camp to the press would suggest that he's going to move on.I emans about his contracts and whats he doing.
none of us really know he's got an offer from city or if he's turned it down or who is in for him.
I'd actually love him to go play for arsenal now and be good and make jimmy bite his pillow in frustration.