Depends on your definition of competing.We've no intent in competing.
Anyone saying the squad is awesome and nobody could improve on endo and tsimiaks and jones clearly have no real intent.
Depends on your definition of competing.We've no intent in competing.
Anyone saying the squad is awesome and nobody could improve on endo and tsimiaks and jones clearly have no real intent.
In summary - we didn't have a good transfer window. Chiesa as a backup for Jota is good because we know that Jota struggles to play a full season. That's one tick in one box. Mamardashvili for next season, loaned back for free, not ideal but evidence of a bit of succession planning. Not sure that gets a tick in a box.
Selling and loaning the best of the younger players, again not sure that is the best move with the amount and intensity of games coming up. We have Virgil, Konaté, Gomez and Quansah as CB's, two who are injury prone, with literally nobody else. We must be due a relatively injury free season. If not, we've given ourselves a massive task to compete seriously in four competitions.
Depends on your definition of competing.
It's a big let's wait and see season for me. I can't blame FSG because I believe we do have money to spend but only on this new strategy of spending it on undervalued and/or underpriced players or players with release clauses and that must surely be the transfer bods decisions. John Henry was all in for £110m on one player don't forget.If we'd bought a DM, Gordon, and a CM/LB, and then bought Chiesa (or even without Gordon), I'd have been saying it was a great window and the signing of Chiesa on that fee and wages was a masterstroke. As it is, we're expecting Gravenberch to develop into some sort of hybrid DM/AM on the basis of a couple of decentish performances, and really have no injuries whilst competing on four fronts. And I still say that the only reason Gravenberch has looked okay so far is that Szobbo has started the season in full, high-energy mode (apart from the first half against Ipswich), and that gives everyone, most of all Macca, so much more room and time to do their stuff - remember thought that he fell off a ****ing cliff energy-wise from around late October bar a handful of performances in between an injury-hit 2nd half of the season. We're putting a lot of eggs in that basket, IMO.
Let's be totally honest, this team will NOT make it through until next March/April while still being in the hunt for the league - and FSG know that. Maybe it would have been too much to ask Slot to do that in his first season anyway, but I get the feeling FSG are happy to consolidate top four and a CL place as a sort of Mike Ashley at Newcastle with go-faster stripes model for the club. And I'll say this now - the way Chelsea, United, Spurs and Villa have developed and bought we are being complacent and/or arrogant to think that any other than City and Arsenal are guaranteed top four. This could be going back to two seasons ago without a doubt.
show me one person who has said that .We've no intent in competing.
Anyone saying the squad is awesome and nobody could improve on endo and tsimiaks and jones clearly have no real intent.
I suppose the lack of activity in the transfer market could be seen as a lack of intent. Thing is none of us has a crystal ball so we'll just have to wait and see.show me one person who has said that .
If we'd bought a DM, Gordon, and a CM/LB, and then bought Chiesa (or even without Gordon), I'd have been saying it was a great window and the signing of Chiesa on that fee and wages was a masterstroke. As it is, we're expecting Gravenberch to develop into some sort of hybrid DM/AM on the basis of a couple of decentish performances, and really have no injuries whilst competing on four fronts. And I still say that the only reason Gravenberch has looked okay so far is that Szobbo has started the season in full, high-energy mode (apart from the first half against Ipswich), and that gives everyone, most of all Macca, so much more room and time to do their stuff - remember thought that he fell off a ****ing cliff energy-wise from around late October bar a handful of performances in between an injury-hit 2nd half of the season. We're putting a lot of eggs in that basket, IMO.
Let's be totally honest, this team will NOT make it through until next March/April while still being in the hunt for the league - and FSG know that. Maybe it would have been too much to ask Slot to do that in his first season anyway, but I get the feeling FSG are happy to consolidate top four and a CL place as a sort of Mike Ashley at Newcastle with go-faster stripes model for the club. And I'll say this now - the way Chelsea, United, Spurs and Villa have developed and bought we are being complacent and/or arrogant to think that any other than City and Arsenal are guaranteed top four. This could be going back to two seasons ago without a doubt.
don't get me wrong we needed more in particular CB cover just the constant hyperbole gets on my tits .I suppose the lack of activity in the transfer market could be seen as a lack of intent. Thing is none of us has a crystal ball so we'll just have to wait and see.
If FSG didn't think this team could make it til next March/ April then the recruitment would have been a bit different to Chiesa and the will he won't he Zubimendi, especially when you see Bajetic going on loan etc.
It's a big let's wait and see season for me. I can't blame FSG because I believe we do have money to spend but only on this new strategy of spending it on undervalued and/or underpriced players or players with release clauses and that must surely be the transfer bods decisions. John Henry was all in for £110m on one player don't forget.
Unless Slot has some magical powers that stops injuries and gets more out of the same team than Klopp could, then the lack of strengthening is going to be very telling. I am, however, fully open to being pleasantly surprised.
show me one person who has said that .
For instance...
You must log in or register to see media
The recruitment is confusing. If they have targets but will only seemingly buy when they come available it seems to be leaving a lot to chance. Either you need to fill certain positions or you don't. Money is clearly available so who is deciding?don't get me wrong we needed more in particular CB cover just the constant hyperbole gets on my tits .
The recruitment is confusing. If they have targets but will only seemingly buy when they come available it seems to be leaving a lot to chance. Either you need to fill certain positions or you don't. Money is clearly available so who is deciding?
If we'd bought a DM, Gordon, and a CM/LB, and then bought Chiesa (or even without Gordon), I'd have been saying it was a great window and the signing of Chiesa on that fee and wages was a masterstroke. As it is, we're expecting Gravenberch to develop into some sort of hybrid DM/AM on the basis of a couple of decentish performances, and really have no injuries whilst competing on four fronts. And I still say that the only reason Gravenberch has looked okay so far is that Szobbo has started the season in full, high-energy mode (apart from the first half against Ipswich), and that gives everyone, most of all Macca, so much more room and time to do their stuff - remember thought that he fell off a ****ing cliff energy-wise from around late October bar a handful of performances in between an injury-hit 2nd half of the season. We're putting a lot of eggs in that basket, IMO.
Let's be totally honest, this team will NOT make it through until next March/April while still being in the hunt for the league - and FSG know that. Maybe it would have been too much to ask Slot to do that in his first season anyway, but I get the feeling FSG are happy to consolidate top four and a CL place as a sort of Mike Ashley at Newcastle with go-faster stripes model for the club. And I'll say this now - the way Chelsea, United, Spurs and Villa have developed and bought we are being complacent and/or arrogant to think that any other than City and Arsenal are guaranteed top four. This could be going back to two seasons ago without a doubt.
Haven’t seen anything in what spurs or chelsea have brought that makes me worried about them one bit.
Spurs have 66 points from last year and a year further development so have to be considered for 4th.
Chelsea are a mess but the manager has Palmer and plenty of chances for dives to get him pens. They also has a nice run last seasons to suggest a consistent selection via ostracised unwanted players might get them going. Again they only need to improve by being better against bottom.half to contend from last year.
Neither will get near the top 2.
Again how to lfc get to 70? It's beating the bottom half as there's 60 points there
The most consistent sides will get there imo. So we can't discount a club like spurs who have continuity.
Tomorrow will tell a lot about us and utd.
Have no idea where you got this from since everything i have seen suggests we agreed to pay the release fee but player decided against the move something you agreed with not that long ago as you decided Zubimendi had used us tyo get a better contractLook we might think there's money but let's look at the annual accounts.
We think they have a short list of targets but then we hear only one player off it will do.
We bid on lavia we think. We bid on caicedo the same window. We turned around and bought endo from nowhere.
So there was a short list then and we went though it and ended up where? The very bottom or what? No idea.
Son we dug out another list and zubimendi was on it and we were begging for a bit of a deal off real Sociedad until apparently tje player choice to change his mind. Who really knows if we triggered a clause or were willing to.
Why didn't we go down the list this time? No idea.