- May 22, 2011
- 73,741
- 25,670
- 113
It’s not just FSG that we need to realise that. They aren’t the ones trying to keep bobby and Milner until they’re 80 …
Milner will be just approaching his prime then
It’s not just FSG that we need to realise that. They aren’t the ones trying to keep bobby and Milner until they’re 80 …
It’s not just FSG that we need to realise that. They aren’t the ones trying to keep bobby and Milner until they’re 80 …
Seems to me that we've been waiting to sign Bellingham on the idea that he would could cost about £80-90m (as that's what was being reported) so we've been saving for him and haven't looked to replace in those last 2 years and handed out contracts to cover the wait.It’s a guess but I’m pretty sure that at any point in the last 2 years, had Klopp had an option to replace, he would have. Sometimes having no options means that you stay with what you know.
Seems to me that we've been waiting to sign Bellingham on the idea that he would could cost about £80-90m (as that's what was being reported) so we've been saving for him and haven't looked to replace in those last 2 years and handed out contracts to cover the wait.
However in that time we've ignored what was happening in the team, so that just one player isn't enough anymore not matter how good and at the same time Bellingham has continued to improve and had a good world cup meaning Dortmund can raise the price.
We should have tried and gambled last summer when the price was being quoted at £80-90m. Now he's out of the price range and we need a number of players to rebuild.
We clearly wanted Tchoumeni
Last summer yes, but this coming summer was clearly earmarked for Bellingham.We clearly wanted Tchoumeni
Last summer yes, but this coming summer was clearly earmarked for Bellingham.
So last summer when Tchoumeni went to Real, we could have looked to Bellingham a year early.
Instead we decided not to bother as it wasn't in the 'plan' as we'd been waiting till this summer.
Last summer yes, but this coming summer was clearly earmarked for Bellingham.
So last summer when Tchoumeni went to Real, we could have looked to Bellingham a year early.
Instead we decided not to bother as it wasn't in the 'plan' as we'd been waiting till this summer.
Last summer yes, but this coming summer was clearly earmarked for Bellingham.
So last summer when Tchoumeni went to Real, we could have looked to Bellingham a year early.
Instead we decided not to bother as it wasn't in the 'plan' as we'd been waiting till this summer.

we clearly appeared to based on media reports and second hand info.
just to be as pedantic and a certain someone
Take it he wasn't on your self-made list then?
Although Dortmund clearly said from the outset that they weren't going to sell him until this summer. Maybe (even) more money would have changed their mind but if everyone felt that the midfield could hold together for one more year then I can see why they waited.Last summer yes, but this coming summer was clearly earmarked for Bellingham.
So last summer when Tchoumeni went to Real, we could have looked to Bellingham a year early.
Instead we decided not to bother as it wasn't in the 'plan' as we'd been waiting till this summer.
Clear we've interested in Bellingham for a number of years, even before he went to Dortmund.You said "been waiting", part tense. Or do you mean we've been waiting outside the transfer window?
We had targets last summer, they didn't happen and we opted to not waste the money.
Clear we've interested in Bellingham for a number of years, even before he went to Dortmund.
Its been on the cards that Bellingham was going to leave Dortmund in the near future for a number of years, so yes we've been waiting till we had the money and opportunity to buy him, which includes inside and outside the transfer window.
You do know you can buy players outside of a transfer window.
Waste money? On a player we wanted to buy anyway, doesn't make sense. Now said player is out of our price range and we need to buy others as well.
You said "been waiting", part tense. Or do you mean we've been waiting outside the transfer window?
We had targets last summer, they didn't happen and we opted to not waste the money.
But Bellingham was a target.Context!
Our targets didn't materialise so we didn't sign anyone. Ie didn't waste money on a gambler or panic buy.
Obviously someone is now going to point at Arthur; he was a cheap loan, hardly a high risk and high waste.
But Bellingham was a target.
Maybe not an immediate last summers target, but a future target.
Price was quoted to be £80-90m last summer, now its £130m.
If we only had a budget for a midfielder at £80mish and had put a bid in for Bellingham but been knocked back, then fair enough. But we missed out on one and then didn't bother with any other potential future targets.
I agree spending £130m is ludicrous for one player.Dortmund were never letting Haaland and Bellingham leave in the same window so figures quoted are moot.
Last summer, we probably felt one or two additions were enough to keep us going, that's not the case now so we're not going to spend that amount on one player. Imo, we never were.
I agree spending £130m is ludicrous for one player.
And my point wasn't about Bellingham in particular. He is just the current story
Also I'm not sure I like the 'enough to keep us going', but that really does feel like a FSG attitude. Its that sort of thinking that leads to eventually just doing enough to hold a position,' just enough to be top4', 'just enough to be in the league' etc.