Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Not much point complaining about the quality of the source- they are what they are, rumour mills. What makes one any better than the others?

A few (a very few) actually tell us the real targets. Rawk bans all rumours like this, they have to be from one or two people.

I just like to comment on the source as people should realise it's not worth reading or clicking some.
 
A few (a very few) actually tell us the real targets. Rawk bans all rumours like this, they have to be from one or two people.

I just like to comment on the source as people should realise it's not worth reading or clicking some.
I wasn't having a go at you, just a general comment that they're all much of a muchness. We shouldn't know who the targets are, that's a bit like peeping at your presents before Christmas.
 
I wasn't having a go at you, just a general comment that they're all much of a muchness. We shouldn't know who the targets are, that's a bit like peeping at your presents before Christmas.

Ignore him, he's been a moody **** for months. Fanboy as long gone...
 
I wasn't having a go at you, just a general comment that they're all much of a muchness. We shouldn't know who the targets are, that's a bit like peeping at your presents before Christmas.

We shouldn't, the thing is the club like most clubs is leaking stuff for it's own purposes.

For a real rumour you can have 3 sources, selling club, agent or buying club.... you can usually tell. Then there's the **** trope that's not worth anyone's time thst completevrubbish or recycled.

If Liverpool leak something out then it's worth wondering why.
 
We shouldn't, the thing is the club like most clubs is leaking stuff for it's own purposes.

For a real rumour you can have 3 sources, selling club, agent or buying club.... you can usually tell. Then there's the **** trope that's not worth anyone's time thst completevrubbish or recycled.

If Liverpool leak something out then it's worth wondering why.
You'd think leaks would harm rather than help.
 
No need to heap expectations on the guy. He's got a long way to go before he's anywhere near the "new Gerrard", and it's unfair to saddle him with that tag.

A few fans getting carried away isn't going to effect the lad.

Can't say I've seen anyone label him the new Gerrard. Assuming it to be true as you suggest, it's just a ridiculous suggestion that doesn't warrant interaction.
 
A few fans getting carried away isn't going to effect the lad.

Can't say I've seen anyone label him the new Gerrard. Assuming it to be true as you suggest, it's just a ridiculous suggestion that doesn't warrant interaction.
Well, don't know about you, but I was referring to this - **** grammar and all:
Liverpool: Naby Keita isn’t the answer to Steven Gerrard’s heir, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain is
 
Wasn’t richarlison one because klopp was sene with his agent or something? Because I’m sure he’s the only clients agent, not like they have about 200 players each
 
Wasn’t richarlison one because klopp was sene with his agent or something? Because I’m sure he’s the only clients agent, not like they have about 200 players each

He probably has the same agent as someone already at our club.. or like in most jobs you actually speak to people working in a similar field. It feeds the Twitter fiends so let them have it!