Especially January one. Summer is much more betterI ****ing hate transfer windows actually. It's ridiculous

Especially January one. Summer is much more betterI ****ing hate transfer windows actually. It's ridiculous

You know Americans, they like to do their own differently "Soccer" is theirsSoccer!!!
Don't want him now![]()
Especially January one. Summer is much more better![]()
I don't like to see players labelled as "lazy" because they don't run around as much as some others do.
£257m bid for Ronaldo along with £85m a year in wages apparently from Chinese club.
Absolutely bonkers.

I ****ing hate transfer windows actually. It's ridiculous
If there are no transfer window, clubs are not going to make money especially small ones.
I'm not against transfers (although, if a clubs way of staying financially viable is through transfers alone they have problems).
I'm against specific windows for transfers. I think it inflated prices and unlike it's intention to level the playing field by not letting big teams buy their way out of injury crisis it has the opposite effect because the bigger the team the more they can spend on backup players and often have 2 teams of almost equally strong players.
I'd rather they cap the number of players that may be transferred in one season than have transfer windows.
Is Ox out of contract in the summer? If so, he can sign a pre contract in January can't he?
Have a few gooner mates who moan at his (and Walcotts) inconsistency and injury record.
Would be an interesting signing. Has a lot of the attributes that Klopp likes but it's more than likely the agent rattling the cage.
If he was, he could only sign pre-contract terms in January for a foreign club.
If my auntie had a penis she's be my uncle...
*waits for inevitable gay joke
What do they call a woman who have both?You wish your auntie had a penis!![]()
Married?What do they call a woman who have both?
What do they call a woman who have both?
Married?
What do they call a woman who have both?
Of course if we had no restriction on transfers, and teams were allowed to buy and sell at will, the big clubs would be seen as being able to spend out of trouble and people would complain about a lack of financial parity. But the transfer window doesn't create balance or fairness either as all it does is concentrate the clubs' total financial resources (for players) into a confined period and lead to the massive inflation you mention and also panic which drives prices and wages and agents cuts up as well. Neither are perfect. A player cap is one thing. I'd much prefer a spending cap/restriction so bigger, more lucrative clubs weren't able to attract better players through exorbitant fees, wages and add ons, therefore hopefully giving a better spread of good players across more teams since less financially mobile clubs would be able to compete.