Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
He was never what man utd wanted deep down. He's too negative and just plays **** football. The UTD fans I know delude them selves by making out he's amazing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Page_Moss_Kopite
He was never what man utd wanted deep down. He's too negative and just plays **** football. The UTD fans I know delude them selves by making out he's amazing.

Ferguson did very odd things. he made sure Moyes was appointed and refused Mourinho twice putting in van Gael who is even worse.

once Ferguson was in effect ****ed out of it the board stick in Mourinho proving they know nothing about utds developed styles under Ferguson so now all Utd are is vast spenders with no soul and negative play
 
Ferguson did very odd things. he made sure Moyes was appointed and refused Mourinho twice putting in van Gael who is even worse.

once Ferguson was in effect ****ed out of it the board stick in Mourinho proving they know nothing about utds developed styles under Ferguson so now all Utd are is vast spenders with no soul and negative play

Let's be honest, Ferguson was a dinosaur (a very successful one)and the reason he chose Moyes was so his failure kept Ferguson's successes in the spotlight, he knew he'd be yesterday's news if they would have hired a high profile manager as his successor, he manipulated them until the very end.
 
Ferguson did very odd things. he made sure Moyes was appointed and refused Mourinho twice putting in van Gael who is even worse.

once Ferguson was in effect ****ed out of it the board stick in Mourinho proving they know nothing about utds developed styles under Ferguson so now all Utd are is vast spenders with no soul and negative play
You should try it sometime, even without a "fab four" you get to see loads of goals :emoticon-0100-smile
 
Liverpool remain keen on Southampton's Netherlands international Van Dijk. (Liverpool Echo)

Chelsea could use Belgium striker Michy Batshuayi, 24, as bait as they fight Liverpool and Arsenal for Monaco's France winger Thomas Lemar, 22.

Jurgen Klopp has been buoyed in his pursuit of Lazio defender Stefan de Vrij , as Spanish giants Barcelona have pulled out of the running to sign him.

Liverpool are desperately searching for solutions to their defensive problems, with Klopp likely to bring in reinforcements in January.

p:nth-of-type(2)","sizes":[[8,8]],"hideOnSensitiveArticle":true,"relativePos":"after","additionalClass":"in-article","name":"div-gpt-ad-vip-slot","type":"VIP"}'>

And the race for de Vrij has been made simpler by the news that the Catalan club are no longer interested in signing the player.

The Metro report that the Dutchman's injury problems were a cause for concern for Barca, leaving the Reds hot favourites to land the 25 year old.
 
Just over 2 weeks before the window opens. If ever we need to buy in january, it's now.

yeah.

Who is available?

Thomas lemar has scored a massive one goal this season and monaco are in a dog fight for 2nd-4th for CL qualification. his contract is to 20202 so he's going nowhere even if he is stinking the joint up

VVD? southampton are 4 points off the relegation zone. Will they sell now? do they need strikers?

who else?
 
yeah.

Who is available?

Thomas lemar has scored a massive one goal this season and monaco are in a dog fight for 2nd-4th for CL qualification. his contract is to 20202 so he's going nowhere even if he is stinking the joint up

VVD? southampton are 4 points off the relegation zone. Will they sell now? do they need strikers?

who else?
I don't know if possible but could we not offer ings or origi as part of a deal to get van dyke Jan window?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
do they look that mad?

20mil and origi.. he scored a hat trick against you after all...

no ignore that Wolfsburg video...
Wtf!!

That's a lame ****ing argument mito.

You plucked £20 mill out the air plus origi? I gave no figures!!

What's van dyke valued at whether we agree with fee or not? £70 mill ish.

Explain the £20 mill lol.

I just asked whether we could use those strikers as part of any deal as per your post!!! As they maybe needed strikers.

The stupidity on here at times is ****ing astounding!!!!
 
Wtf!!

That's a lame ****ing argument mito.

You plucked £20 mill out the air plus origi? I gave no figures!!

What's van dyke valued at whether we agree with fee or not? £70 mill ish.

Explain the £20 mill lol.

I just asked whether we could use those strikers as part of any deal as per your post!!! As they maybe needed strikers.

The stupidity on here at times is ****ing astounding!!!!

Sure i made it all up :) I was exaggerating to point out i don't think southampton would be in the least bit interested in either player. so if they were we might as well make out they are worth 30/40mil.

You can call it stupidity, thats fine. It was deliberately specious.

BTW though on a serious note. what does VVD look like he is worth now? Not sure the 70mil holds water.
 
Sure i made it all up :) I was exaggerating to point out i don't think southampton would be in the least bit interested in either player. so if they were we might as well make out they are worth 30/40mil.

You can call it stupidity, thats fine. It was deliberately specious.

BTW though on a serious note. what does VVD look like he is worth now? Not sure the 70mil holds water.

The £70m figure in summer included about £20m extra as a "fine" for media comments. We kept our word and didn't go back so they're not entitled to that any more.

Plus they're [HASHTAG]#desperate[/HASHTAG] to sell to buy a striker.