Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
luvgonzo said:
I agree with that, he's shown he can play in there.
Click to expand...

Trouble for me is, I'm a firm believer of if a player is playing well, leave them be. What sways me is we lack system flexibility ATM, we can't play a back four because we don't have two CBs capable of playing well together. I don't think Can would work there, Skrtel needs to go, Toure is away and the less said about Lovren the better. That just leaves Sakho.
 
Gerrez said:
Trouble for me is, I'm a firm believer of if a player is playing well, leave them be. What sways me is we lack system flexibility ATM, we can't play a back four because we don't have two CBs capable of playing well together. I don't think Can would work there, Skrtel needs to go, Toure is away and the less said about Lovren the better. That just leaves Sakho.
Click to expand...

I agree, we need a center back in the Summer an old head and a good communicator.
 
Gerrez said:
Am I right in thinking its a raising figure? None of those links mention it :huh:
Click to expand...

They do say initial (as I wrote), which indicates that it could rise, but I didn't see any detail on the potential final figure. The Sky Sports article at the time (which I didn't post) just said undisclosed fee.
 
Nozzer said:
They do say initial (as I wrote), which indicates that it could rise, but I didn't see any detail on the potential final figure. The Sky Sports article at the time (which I didn't post) just said undisclosed fee.
Click to expand...

Whatever the figures quoted are, I'd always go with the top figure myself. The additions are usually things that indicate a successful transfer, why would you want the player to fail...?
 
Gerrez said:
Whatever the figures quoted are, I'd always go with the top figure myself. The additions are usually things that indicate a successful transfer, why would you want the player to fail...?
Click to expand...

Not sure but a lot want to see Balotelli fail <whistle>
 
Gerrez said:
Whatever the figures quoted are, I'd always go with the top figure myself. The additions are usually things that indicate a successful transfer, why would you want the player to fail...?
Click to expand...

I went with the top (only) quoted figure. I would say that you need to give all information to be truly accurate. At the end of the day, the transfer fee is only really an issue if the player is a failure, in which case the additions are less likely to be relevant. If they're a success, you don't really care as much about the fee.
 
Nozzer said:
I went with the top (only) quoted figure. I would say that you need to give all information to be truly accurate. At the end of the day, the transfer fee is only really an issue if the player is a failure, in which case the additions are less likely to be relevant. If they're a success, you don't really care as much about the fee.
Click to expand...

True <ok>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back