Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread
- Thread starter Bozz
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- May 22, 2011
- 73,754
- 25,680
- 113
Can't remember which club it was, but somebody offered £30m for Troy Deeney in the summer. Now Deeney's a decent striker, but he's not
in Studge's league.........................£35m for Studge......minimum.
Thanks Jonnybaws
Not just using Deeney as an example, but the obscene transfer market in general.
£20m for Studge would be bargain of the century
He's 27 aswell, in his prime
Thanks Jonnybaws
Not just using Deeney as an example, but the obscene transfer market in general.
£20m for Studge would be bargain of the century
Not if his hip goes. I would sell for as much as can be got asap... but selfishly that should be summer.
The fact is he would be mad to move to a dead end club in January with a medal or two on offer
Also.
His wages of 120k are more than say spurs will pay..... he's not going to be cheap to anyone.
Does this somehow reduce his value?
Of course it does, if a team wants to sell a player he goes a damn sight cheaper than if a team wants to hold onto a player.
Spurs could do with a striker, but like you say, at £150K he's on, he'd smash their wage structure!
Arsenal would be pretty potent with a fit Studge in their side..
But selling to either shouldn't be an option, why strengthen a rival for top 4.
28 next birthday, injures have already taken their toll on his pace, he looks a good yard slower, still a good finisher...
Common sense would dictate we get 25m for him but when we had the "English" tax, we should still try and get closer to 30m for him.
Anyhoo, we're in a strong position, we have no need to sell, so if anyone wants him better offer big money!
Arsenal would be pretty potent with a fit Studge in their side..
But selling to either shouldn't be an option, why strengthen a rival for top 4.
28 next birthday, injures have already taken their toll on his pace, he looks a good yard slower, still a good finisher...
Common sense would dictate we get 25m for him but when we had the "English" tax, we should still try and get closer to 30m for him.
Anyhoo, we're in a strong position, we have no need to sell, so if anyone wants him better offer big money!
Bentekker's didn't fit into Klopps plans yet we still go most of our money back..
Think he's a shrewd operator is Jurgen, won't sell cheap or over pay..
Agreed, whether he's part of klopps plans or not is my supposition. You wasn't questioning if that view was true or not, you were questioning on how that view would affect sturridge's value. I will forgive you though
I didn't say he would go for cheap. I even included an example of where people overpay for unwanted players (borini). It still holds true that generally if a team wants to keep a player, their value goes up and if they don't their value comes down.
- May 22, 2011
- 73,754
- 25,680
- 113
Even worse, some Chinese club offered £37m for Ighalo! Looks silly rejecting that now guy can't hit barn door
But we haven't said we want to sell. He hasn't said he wants to leave. It's all hack writers.
They can say what they like about our Studge. But he's our striker and he's warming our bench.
you obviously missed this:
I wrote (my supposition with logic):
but he certainly doesn't fit into klopps plans (hasn't been rotated in at all, just a super sub).
Does this somehow reduce his value?